Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kazak9999 t1_j1hrqox wrote

−1

JPAnalyst OP t1_j1hzgi3 wrote

The chart literally covers your concerns on the bottom. On the top it covers those who prefer volume. I made it for both groups. However, although I’m a per-game guy, the NFL recognizes volume records regardless of games played. This is tailored more for the official record because that is what matters, that’s what gets people in the Hall of Fame and remembered historically. There’s nothing in your argument I didn’t account for here.

You just got caught being inconsistent in your logic so you attack the chart. Just accept the L and move on, because you’re not bringing anything to light I didn’t account for. And your comment on Johnson was il-informed as he wouldn’t meet your criteria either.

2

kazak9999 t1_j1iaz5q wrote

Attack? Wow. I was only pointing out the discrepancy between a 17 game and 16 game record. You're reading way too much into my words.

1

JPAnalyst OP t1_j1iec01 wrote

>The chart is broken in multiple ways.

Yes that’s an unfair attack of the chart particular because it literally addresses the very concern you were critical of in the first place. Perhaps, it would be warranted if it didn’t, but it did.

1

kazak9999 t1_j1iih4t wrote

I apologize if I hurt your feelings. It was not my intent. I'll be more mindful of that in the future.

1

JPAnalyst OP t1_j1iir2n wrote

Doesn’t matter. You’re a fine person outside of this aggravating conversation. Merry Christmas / Happy Holidays.

1