Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

No-Asparagus6190 t1_j4ic5x3 wrote

It's cool and all but 14,000 acres to produce 2500MW is a lot of land. Some places can manages that but still unreasonable for a lot of the world.

−9

Awkward_moments t1_j4il8j6 wrote

You should see land usage per calorie for different foods

15

No-Asparagus6190 t1_j4imgge wrote

I can see that being a pretty crazy calorie-to-acre comparison as well. Especially for meat.

1

faciepalm t1_j4k0y3y wrote

Some places need to use less land, especially when that land use sucks up local water resources talking specifically about cotton production using water from rivers that fed into the aral sea, which has mostly disappeared in the past 60 years.

1

MeMoses t1_j4ipm70 wrote

Although you have to remember that this land is not rendered useless. It can still be used for farming with elevated solar panels, as grazing land or biotopes. And you can use already sealed spaces like parking spaces and houses.

4

Mr-Negi- t1_j4l05ut wrote

Yup, plus the solar is unreliable. Nuclear is a far better option.

1