AdRepresentative5085 t1_j5kncvo wrote on January 23, 2023 at 6:07 PM

Reply to comment by camxus in Racial diversity in top tech & biotech companies [OC] by teamongered

By what measurement are they fit for the role other than an interview? When you choose a candidate based on numbers charts it misses the entire point of statistics, which is observational data. It doesn’t aim to prove but to disprove, in this case any person is viable. You said it yourself, it’s not about their sex.

camxus t1_j5l86of wrote on January 23, 2023 at 8:17 PM

when did i ever say one should choose them based on the differences in sex? i’m saying these differences exist generally. i believe every candidate for a job is unique case.

obviously a woman who has been able to get the necessary requirements to be competitive on the job market should get the same chances to get the job her male counterparts do.

AdRepresentative5085 t1_j5r9wgk wrote on January 25, 2023 at 12:26 AM

>all women are relegated to non-technical jobs and all men to technical jobs...yet they discriminate men for non-technical positions and women for technical ones and some of the women they turned down are 30x times better

>great example of how sexism hurts both men and women

>stupid comment. this called people in their natural role. and it works.

>when did i ever say one should choose them based on the differences in sex?

Okay. Sure thing. The large discrepancy between both sex groups and their roles has a normal standard deviation, not out of bounds at all, nope.