Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

suflaj t1_j9iwkp8 wrote

Reply to comment by buzzz_buzzz_buzzz in Bummer: nVidia stopping support for multi-gpu peer to peer access with 4090s by mosalreddit

They removed NVLink to cut down on costs on a feature that is supported by only a handful of games in existence and otherwise useless.

−11

shawon-ashraf-93 t1_j9jw9vv wrote

Don’t embarrass yourself over things you don’t know.

6

suflaj t1_j9jwfc9 wrote

OK, and now an actual argument?

Or are you one of those people who unironically believe NVLink enabled memory pooling or things like that?

−9

shawon-ashraf-93 t1_j9jwos2 wrote

NVLink doesn’t have to be gaming specific. Anything that requires high band low latency data transfer will benefit from it. There’s no point of 24gigs of vram if you can’t transfer data between gpus faster in a multi gpu setting.

6

suflaj t1_j9k3bqn wrote

The 300 GB/s, which was its theoretical upper limit of it in a MULTI-GPU workload did not show a significant difference in benchmarks. Please do not gaslight people into believing it did.

−8

shawon-ashraf-93 t1_j9k3j42 wrote

Post the benchmarks :) I’m not the one gaslighting here.

4

suflaj t1_j9khr8s wrote

The burden on proof is on you, since you initially claimed that there will be benefits.

−2