Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Mand125 t1_jadrlwp wrote

Well, the point of the bomb part is you not keeping them under control.

How we did it the first time was decades of research from the world’s best scientists, starting with the basics of nuclear physics and how the different particles would interact. On top of that knowledge was a ton of engineering about how to manufacture the material components needed, including building an entire chemical processing plant at Oak Ridge, TN. Then it was experiments on the different shapes and components, and how to get them to work together.

Ultimately, the process is to take the fissile material and drastically compress it, turning it from merely dangerously radioactive to explosively radioactive.

2

rwkgaming t1_jadsgwg wrote

It took a massive team of over 100000 scientists, in something they named project manhattan. And its more so a why than a how. War is a good motivator to do a lot of stuff, the internet is due to war, commercial airplanes are due to war, etc. So they mostly just wanted a superweapon to wel 'nuke' the opposition into submission.

And keep them under control. Not at all.

The only reason noone is dropping them is because of a principal we call MAD(mutualy assured destruction) if you bomb someone you are sure as hell going to be getting one back because so many countries now have them.

2

breckenridgeback t1_jadtkxm wrote

> And keep them under control. Not at all.

Uh, the world has actually put a huge amount of energy into stopping nuclear proliferation (the term for new countries acquiring nuclear weapons).

Only eight countries are currently believed to have working nuclear weapons. In order of development, they are:

  • the US (1945)
  • Russia (1949)
  • UK (1952)
  • France (1960)
  • China (1964)
  • Israel (sometime in the 1960s or 1970s; unlike the other states on this list Israel does not admit that they have nukes)
  • India (1974)
  • Pakistan (1998)
  • North Korea (2006)

(South Africa also once had them, and would appear on this list somewhere near Israel or India, but South Africa voluntarily disarmed and no longer possesses nuclear weapons.)

No new state has been added to this list in almost 20 years.

1

Flair_Helper t1_jadtypf wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Whole topic overviews are not allowed on ELI5. This subreddit is meant for explanations of specific concepts, not general introductions to broad topics.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

rwkgaming t1_jadu9wd wrote

I wasn't really talking about acquisition. More so the use.

And that kinda feels like some bullshit that noone else has but hey the better. Point still stands, the main control is not wanting to be blown up aswel.

1

A_Garbage_Truck t1_jaduaxl wrote

you cant really keep them under control, this is a genie you cannot put back in the bottle.

one of the core reasons why they are " controlled" is because no single nation has a monopoly of them and said nations are adversaries, as a result of this knowledge all sides went to very extreme measures to ensure they can always retaliate against a nuclear strike as part of their doctrine.

this knowledge resulted in one of 2 principles that still hold ot this day that stop nuclear war : M.A.D.(mutually assured destruction) that dictates that unless you are fully capable of negating your enemy's ability to retalitate launching a nuclear strike is always gonna result in a phyrric victory where nobody wins.

the other principle is the knowledge that a nuclear conflict will stall the global economy meaning none of the interested parties make money anymore(if said parties discovered a means ot turn a nuclear exchange into a profitable thing, then we should all be very scared), this means there is a vested interest in preserving the status quo(ie: this is one of the suspected reasons the current conflict in easterm europe will likely not reach the nuclear phase.)

1

police-ical t1_jadupbt wrote

To add to the why question: The 1940s were a pretty terrifying time in human history. A few powerful countries were under the total control of people who believed their country was superior and had the right to overrun the world around them. Every major country was trying as hard as possible to make the most effective weapons to win the war. In 1941-42, it looked entirely possible that Germany was going to overrun the Soviet Union, murder or starve most of the people living in Eastern Europe, and be in an invulnerable position controlling Europe with an eye towards the Middle East, while Japan might control much of Asia. The idea of a bomb that could destroy a city looked like the one thing that could defeat Germany and save civilization. The U.S. and U.K. poured a lot of money and top scientists into it because it looked like a war-winner. (Fun fact: The project to develop the B-29 bomber, which dropped the first atomic bomb, was actually more expensive than the bomb project.) In the end, the Soviets fought like hell, the Western allies invaded as well, and Germany lost a conventional war, so Japan got bombed instead.

1

Nowhere_Man_Forever t1_jadw42i wrote

Nuclear bombs were invented due to a series of advancements in physics that occurred in the late 1800s and early 1900s that revolutionized our understanding of the world. I will treat this as a list of the most important ones

  1. Electromagnetism. In the 1800s, a great deal of research was done on electricity and magnetism that ended up realizing that these two forces are the same force in different forms. The main result of this for our purposes is that this work led to the discovery that the speed of light is constant and dependent on the laws of physics, which implies that if the laws of physics stay the same regardless of where you are, the speed of light is constant. This led to a major problem in physics since this is kind of impossible in classical physics.

  2. Atomic theory. In the 1890s and 1900s the structure of the atom began to be understood. Scientists discovered that atoms are made of a nucleus comprised of positively charged protons and uncharged neutrons, and negatively charged electrons surrounding it.

  3. Radioactivity. Around the same time as modern atomic theory was getting going, scientists such as Marie Curie began studying radioactivity and the properties of radioactive substances and the fact that radioactive elements can turn into other elements

  4. Relativity. Albert Einstein revolutionized physics by solving the problem that arose in step 1 where light has a constant speed regardless of where you are, by developing his Theory of Relativity. Essentially Einstein used math to determine what the laws of physics would be like if we just accepted that the speed of light in a vacuum was just constant regardless of any other effects. This resulted in drastically different physical laws than what we may expect based on Isaac Newton's formulation of physics, but importantly the differences are only apparent in circumstances we don't see very often in our everyday lives. Most important to our nuclear bomb discussion is that a weird result of Relativity is that mass and energy are equivalent to each other, via the famous equation E=mc^2. This means that matter can be converted into energy and vice versa. This also explained why radioactive substances can turn into different elements only by emitting energy.

  5. Nuclear science. In the following decades, scientists used the previous discoveries to develop a broader theory of nuclear science, gaining a better and better understanding of how radiation works, how to control it, and how to produce it.

After all of that, we finally had the theoretical background for a nuclear bomb. Nuclear bombs work by converting a relatively large (i.e. more than a couple micrograms) amount of matter into energy very rapidly. In practice, this means putting a lot of material that can trigger a chain reaction of radioactive decay events all in one place. Nuclear bombs are designed very carefully to use explosives to very rapidly push together nuclear material, which creates the chain reaction that leads to nuclear explosion. The reason the amount of energy is so great is that same E=mc^2 equation. E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. Since the speed of light is a very big number, you can see that even a fairly small amount of mass is equivalent to a quite large amount of energy. If you can convert a significant amount of mass into energy very quickly, it leads to a giant explosion because of the sheer amount of energy released.

2