Submitted by Best_Bug4471 t3_11el6v1 in explainlikeimfive
Comments
[deleted] t1_jaenug3 wrote
[removed]
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_jaeolvu wrote
Please read this entire message
Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Top level comments (i.e. comments that are direct replies to the main thread) are reserved for explanations to the OP or follow up on topic questions (Rule 3).
Very short answers, while allowed elsewhere in the thread, may not exist at the top level.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.
Nashirakins t1_jaeob3v wrote
“How old you are at birth” varies depending on the culture. If you follow eg the long standing Korean method, I’m two years older than I am if you decide that age at birth is 0 months old. (South Korea is changing to the 0-at-birth scheme soon.)
Severe_Atmosphere_44 t1_jaepz7r wrote
If you believe in the Bible then you know that the soul enters the body with the first breath. A fetus does not have a soul, so the time in the womb doesn't count.
Besides, 'birthday' literally means the day you were born.
[deleted] t1_jaenkfh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaeo4ht wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaeo7d5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaeofie wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaeog7r wrote
[removed]
doterobcn t1_jaep4ij wrote
We as a society have decided that the time you spend inside your mother does not count as your age, and that's why we celebrate Birth Days to mark the passing of each year.
We could get more medical or scientific and say that while you're inside the uterus, you're still developing as a human being and you're not formed 100%, so we decide that when you get out, it's because you're fully formed and ready to rock the world.
In Korea if i recall correctly they are 1 year older because they account for this time, but again, it's a decision as a society.
Flair_Helper t1_jaep9xk wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
[deleted] t1_jaepe2x wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaer0ct wrote
[removed]
MMMFoodies t1_jaet3bs wrote
Because humans count BIRTHdays. Plus, conception is harder to pinpoint, exactly. Therefore, counting in years, from the date of birth, is the standard worldwide. (Except in societies or social groups or religious groups where birthdays are not celebrated.) This has been the way, going back as far as 3000 BC, at least, when there is documentation of an Egyptian Pharaoh's date of birth.
Nowhere_Man_Forever t1_jaep8ax wrote
Finding out the exact date of conception is basically impossible and historically the date of birth or baptism was the basis for age in western countries. Expecting everyone to change the convention for something like this is just unrealistic.
dkf295 t1_jaeni4o wrote
Because 9 months is vaguely close to an average date from conception so you can't just backdate it from birth and have it mean anything. And many people don't know the precise date of conception.
Meanwhile, it's pretty unambiguous when you deliver a baby.