Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

beardyramen t1_jabotel wrote

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/stevensavage/2022/10/12/a-company-offers-an-alternative-to-food-waste-at-the-grocery-store-level/amp/ you can check Forbes for some data.

If you buy an apple for 1 and sell it for 5, you can easily afford wasting 1 apple in 3, if it nets you more sales.

Also you can afford to loose something in the fruit department, if you compensate with increased sales on a high-end product.

Ofc the small shop run by Roberto close to my parents' cannot afford this mindset, but big chains can.

1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_jabrb35 wrote

Your citation tends to refute the idea retailers waste food on purpose.

1

beardyramen t1_jabun88 wrote

It says that companies try to keep it to a minimum. But surplus means "more than needed".

So companies stock more than needed. In part to compensate for demand fluctuation, in part to optimize procurement costs, in part to provide the customer with a pleasing visual experience.

Sadly, to sell 10 apples we currently "need" a stock of 13.

Then, i'm not your mom, nor your boss. You are free to have your own opinion on procurement strategies of grocers. Not every retailer works the same way, some are more virtuos than others.

But as a matter of fact the western world wastes about 1/3 of its food pipeline.

I am telling that this is not due to incompetence of supply planners, but due to deliberate planning. We accept an inefficiency there for a positive outcome in another point of the chain.

Should you disagree with my opinion, you are welcome to. I will believe you to be naive in thinking that losses of this magnitude are not accounted for accurately, but I will respect your position.

1