fubo t1_jadsqbd wrote
A quantum particle isn't exactly a solid chunk of stuff. In some ways, it's more accurately pictured as a ripple in the fields that make up the universe.
It so happens that these ripples only come in whole-number sizes (they are "quantized") — so you can have no electron, or one electron, or two, etc., but you can't have half an electron or seven-fifteenths of an electron.
(That's what makes it quantum physics. In classical physics, there was never any rule that you couldn't split a chunk of matter down indefinitely. That turned out to just be wrong.)
What are "fields", though? A field is just some quantity measured at each point in some space and time. An example of a non-quantum field is the wind on the surface of a planet. The wind has some value at every point on the globe. (It might be zero, if the air is still.) And it changes over time. A breeze and a tornado are two different phenomena in the wind field.
(The wind is a vector field; at any point, it has both a magnitude and a direction. Air pressure and temperature are scalar fields; at any point, each has only a single numerical quantity. Gravity is a vector field; mass density is a scalar field. There are other more complicated kinds of field too.)
Why does it matter that particles are ripples and not tiny solid chunks? Well, one reason is that a ripple is inherently spread out, whereas a solid chunk has an exact single location.
And while solid chunks can only interact by bumping into each other, ripples can interact through interference — they can reinforce or cancel each other out. Solid classical-physics chunks can't do that.
(For another non-quantum example: Interference between ripples is also how, for instance, noise-cancelling headphones work: they make a sound wave that cancels out the noise.)
It's this interference that explains a lot of the "weird" effects in quantum physics, like the double-slit experiment. It's not that a particle "really is" a solid chunk that's magically in two places at once; rather, it never was a solid chunk at all, but a ripple that can interfere with other ripples, including its own echoes.
MrHeavenTrampler OP t1_jadvgu6 wrote
So our graphical representation of atoms is to a certain extent wrong? Now, since I am reading the Hyperspace book, I guess it would help to understand if dimensions are created from the subatomic particle's interference/reinforcement, or they just are? Naturally, time I know is created by the expansion of the universe.
Asking this, it came to mind what is dark matter? Is it literally matter with just opposite charge? If so, do subatomic particles also form it like normal matter's electrons and protons?
huskers2468 t1_jaeylat wrote
I highly recommend watching PBS space time on YouTube. Great host with amazing graphics to give you a way to follow along.
I wish I watched it while getting my degree.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments