Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

degening t1_jebeeps wrote

Reply to comment by Emyrssentry in ELI5 How Zeno's Paradox is a paradox? by TheFlaccidCarrot

This is not a paradox for 2 reasons:

  1. You are assuming language is logically consistent, it is not.

  2. You are assuming logically consistent systems are also complete, they are not.

−3

urzu_seven t1_jedo7ql wrote

>You are assuming language is logically consistent, it is not.

You declaring something to be true (or not true) does not make it so.

Nor does the paradox (it is a paradox btw, you don't get to unilaterally define what a paradox is or is not and the above is definitely accepted as a valid paradox) depending ALL language being logically consistent, it is, in fact that language can express logically inconsistent statements that allows paradoxes.

​

>You are assuming logically consistent systems are also complete, they are not.

This has literally nothing to do with the original statement OR the comment you are replying to.

2