Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Toger t1_jdfkrji wrote

All the rain hitting the roof has to drain off it at the same rate it is arriving though, since the roof isn't a deep pool. Hence all the piping etc has to handle the full volume of rain -- the ridges aren't holding the water back except to absorb some of its kinetic energy.

5

MrShotson t1_jdfvxg7 wrote

I think that's incorrect, to a certain extent. Increasing the overall surface area of the roof increases the volume of water that can be on it at one time. Each of those ridges would act as a cistern capable of holding a volume of water that would have otherwise overran a simple slope. Instead of a straightforward through-rate, you need to take into account many small pockets of internal storage. Depending on the frequency and intensity of rain in the area, that could be significant.

2

Toger t1_jdg71kg wrote

Granted; I was assuming a sustained downpour.

3

MrShotson t1_jdgem8z wrote

Just did a quick Google of weather patterns in Bermuda. Apparently, they average 5 to 7 inches of rain per month. With very little fluctuation. Rain is sudden, heavy, and short-lived. That may kind of make sense for the roofing strategy then.

2

MidnightAdventurer t1_jdh5b8q wrote

Yes and no - water on a flat surface with an open edge doesn't drain at the same speed as water on a smooth slope. You can build up a shallow pool on each ledge that will spilling over the open side. With enough rain, the effect will be overcome and it will basically end up the same and with light enough rain, some of the water will get trapped on the roof and evaporate off but in the middle it should work.
I don't really feel like digging out my old fluid dynamics notes to try to calculate it out but the basic principle makes sense

1