Submitted by jcw10489 t3_1277dky in explainlikeimfive
Icy-Farm-9362 t1_jeddt4c wrote
What's the UK equivalent of "indict"? We don't use that in British English.
Ninjaromeo t1_jedeq9m wrote
To formally be charged or accused of a serious crime.
America and one other country has and extra step with the grand jury, and that part originated in england though I believe you no longer have the grand jury part as an extra unnecessary step
Icy-Farm-9362 t1_jedk66u wrote
So, in the UK we just say...."arrested"? "Charged"? Not really sure.
Ninjaromeo t1_jedklre wrote
In america, it is an additional step after arrested, but before the trial.
I am not sure that England had an extra step. But it is charged. Formally saying that there is enough evidence to have a trial.
Icy-Farm-9362 t1_jedllqx wrote
So who decides if there is enough evidence to have a trial in the UK?
I don't think we have grand juries, so....just the police?
fightmaxmaster t1_jedmofz wrote
I'm ill informed but maybe the CPS - Crown Prosecution Service. I think very roughly the police gather information and run it by / through the CPS, kind of a group of lawyers, who decide if prosecution is appropriate.
kevinmorice t1_jedscn3 wrote
CPS in England / Wales.
Procurator Fiscal in Scotland.
kevinmorice t1_jedsb7g wrote
In the UK we don't have the same process. Rather than have a prosecution go to a jury, without hearing a defence, and allow them to decide if there is a case to answer we have the CPS (England and Wales) or Procurator Fiscal (Scotland) who make those decisions on whether a case has sufficient evidence to go ahead.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments