Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iu9yztb wrote

There was no real use of air forces. The artillery was largely ineffectual against entrenched troops. Chemical was a VERY double edged sword.

So you were really only left with a creeping barrage or a mass formation running to the other line.

That was the biggest lesson learned in WW1 don't become entrenched because it becomes a war of attrition. Hence the German changes in WW2

14

tiredstars t1_iuam3el wrote

>So you were really only left with a creeping barrage or a mass formation running to the other line.

I was going to make a technical and slightly pedantic point, but I've realised it might be one that illustrates something important about WW1 that /u/Version2dnb might be interested in.

What is a creeping barrage? A creeping barrage is an artillery barrage that moves forwards at a slow, steady pace (typically in 50-100 yard increments). If your opponents are sitting in some trenches, why not just keep hitting those trenches rather than moving your barrage?

A creeping barrage has three main goals: to keep the enemy's heads down while your own advance, to prevent reinforcements advancing or defenders retreating, and to throw up smoke and dust to cover the advance.

It "creeps" forwards so that it stays ahead of your own troops as they advance. There's no need to communicate with the artillery to say "we've reached this line, move the barrage", something that was difficult to do in the early days of field telephones. The troops just have to stick to the timetable of the barrage.

Of course, "just stick to the timetable" is anything but easy. But the whole idea shows how armies were trying to figure out ways to use combined arms and to deal with the problems they faced on the battlefield. Techniques for barrages became increasingly complex and effective as the war went on.

8

Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iuawxz3 wrote

100% and thanks for explaining this. I wish I had more time to explain with 3 kids but you exactly what I wanted to say as well

1

[deleted] OP t1_iu9zl4l wrote

[deleted]

2

Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iua0q28 wrote

A war of attrition is what you call a meat grinder. You can't have an decisive victory and you your's loose a lot of resources and the other side does too. It really comes down to who can throw more bodies at something also known as a punic victory

10

Pocok5 t1_iuadvsa wrote

*pyrrhic

Punic is when you try three times, get flattened and your backyard gets salted.

17

Supraman83 t1_iuafjkv wrote

>Punic is when you try three times, get flattened and your backyard gets salted.

Okay that made my day

6

luckygiraffe t1_iua1c93 wrote

If you're interested in a much more substantial delve into WW1 and questions like this, I highly recommend The Great War channel on YouTube

3