Submitted by jambo5600 t3_yhr58l in explainlikeimfive
jensjoy t1_iufkcfx wrote
Sry that's not an explanation but what paywall did they put up?
Pantone only makes sense in print, on screen you can only get a close estimate of what the color will look like and rgb to pantone converters are all around.
WilliamMinorsWords t1_iufl4i4 wrote
This just happened recently. Adobe and Pantone decided that if you open a file, no matter how old, that contains a PMS color, it will show as black unless you pay a monthly subscription for it to show. Last I heard, it's like $21/month per color.
It doesn't matter if you're just an individual designer or even a school. This is obviously aimed at major corporations with major brands who will just pay it. But for everyone else, you will just see a black blob.
jensjoy t1_iufmzg3 wrote
Oh wow, I somehow missed that. Thanks.
That's bad. Adobe has been unchallenged for too long. A lot of stuff they've pulled off since CC would have had big parts of their userbase running off if there was a considerable alternative.
WilliamMinorsWords t1_iufop1k wrote
I think this just came out in the last couple of days, so don't feel like you're out of the loop or anything.
Adobe is becoming like the Amazon of design. They are acquiring everything, and unfortunately, we can't do our jobs with it. They acquired a major SaaS company, and now they're running wild with the subscription model.
Last week was the Adobe MAX conference, and they've now structured it so that all the good sessions are in person, and the virtual sessions I attended were absolute crap.
I've been an Adobe user since Illustrator88, but I feel like they've just jumped the shark at this point.
FogletGilet t1_iugg3fi wrote
No it is $21/month for the plugin that does all. You don't pay per color.
WilliamMinorsWords t1_iuggpi2 wrote
Ah, fair enough. Thanks.
nebman227 t1_iuivyn1 wrote
Please update your original comment
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments