Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Sand_Trout t1_iy4fdjl wrote

There are three major causes:

  1. Erosion. Wind, rain, snow, ect. gradually wear down craters on Earth's surface over time.

  2. Fewer surface impacts per m^2 . Because the Earth has a relatively thick atmosphere, a lot of the smaller rocks break up before hitting the surface or slow sufficiently to mitigate their impact on the surface.

  3. Tectonic activity. Unlike the Moon, the Earth is still tectonically active, with volcanos faults gradually erasing some craters.

47

rslashmiko t1_iy4gee9 wrote

I'd add in a 4th. Coverage. There are a lot of craters that are covered by water, forests, etc.

22

mr_oof t1_iy4l6oz wrote

Per #1: the Canadian Shield has some of oldest exposed rock on Earth, and has some huge craters- you just have to look really hard. Like, a large roundish lake with circle of small lakes on a satellite map, or a region of super-concentrated mineral deposits (both of which you see in the area around Sudbury, Ontario.)

9

SlippySlappySamson t1_iy5vve4 wrote

  1. The moon. It has significant gravity and has historically attracted much of the debris headed our way, and thus has more craters to be visible.
8

FowlOnTheHill t1_iy7ll0n wrote

Couldn’t the same be true about earth? It’s significant gravity pulls away debris headed to the moon?

2

SlippySlappySamson t1_iy7o852 wrote

Yeah, of course! The nature of orbital mechanics (and I don't understand it well at all) and the frequency at which the Moon orbits the Earth means that it's likely that anything zooming in is probably going to encounter the Moon's gravity first, but it's by no means guaranteed.

3

FowlOnTheHill t1_iy4heqt wrote

Atmosphere

5

SpaceMonkee8O t1_iy660ev wrote

Yeah that’s the main difference.

2

As_TheHoursPass t1_iy6zc2j wrote

It may not be. Chicxulub is absolutely massive but not visible from a normal satellite. It's been eroded by time. When you consider just how gargantuan that planet killer was, it gives erosion and plate tectonics a much stronger argument.

It wasn't even that long ago from a planetery age viewpoint, given its size.

1

SpaceMonkee8O t1_iy6znti wrote

Granted our planet is much more geologically active and that definitively plays a part, but I feel like erosion is largely an atmospheric phenomenon.

1

wachseln t1_iy4ehqr wrote

Well for one thing the earth does have craters, but they’re often underwater, but the earth also has a thick atmosphere (compared to the moon’s) which breaks up most of the asteroids before they can do much damage to the surface of earth.

13

KirisBeuller t1_iy4ell7 wrote

Earth is geologically active. The moon is not. Volcanoes cover and "heal" those craters. We DO have them but they're far less pronounced.

5

jennimackenzie t1_iy4emi5 wrote

I think little space debris that slams into the moon at astronomical speeds does not make it through to us because of our atmosphere. We do have huge craters on earth, so inevitably we will have another. I wonder when.

4

llMithrandirll t1_iy4ians wrote

We also have smaller craters too. They just come from much larger original asteroids (meters in diameter) that broke up and had most of their material burn away in the atmosphere. The big craters come from extremely rare asteroids that were originally kilometers in diameter. There has only been about 60 of those meteor strikes and the earth has been around for 4.5 BILLION years so the odds of one hitting earth again before humans go extinct is pretty low.

4 500 000 000/60=75 000 000.

That's an average of one large meteor strike every 75 million years and the average mammal species only lasts about 1 million years. Humans have already been around for about 200 000 years.

1

[deleted] t1_iy6igu1 wrote

[deleted]

1

llMithrandirll t1_iy6is3l wrote

And what makes you think that our stupidity at governing isn't a part of nature? Also just because we're a technological species doesn't mean that nature can't eliminate us. That kind of thinking is what leads to shit like the Titanic.

1

Mastodon996 t1_iy4evdd wrote

Earth has a much more active surface than the moon. Plate tectonics constantly recycles crust by burying it and making new crust, weather erodes crust, etc. Granted, this is a slow process, but it took the moon billions of years to look how it does today, because those processes don't operate there. So there is virtually nothing to erase those craters.

3

swordgeek t1_iy4ewfh wrote

In short: Atmosphere.

A lot of meteors that come in contact with earth burn up in the atmosphere, and don't make an impact.

Furthermore, there are a lot of impact craters that have been worn down by weather, covered over by plant growth, and so forth - again, essentially due to the fact that we have an atmosphere.

3

llMithrandirll t1_iy4fdhw wrote

The earth has an atmosphere. When the earth passes through a cluster of asteroids (this is what causes meteor showers) the vast majority of them burn up in the atmosphere due to air resistance before they can reach the ground to make a crater. The moon technically also has an atmosphere but it is so thin that we don't really consider it an atmosphere. It can't be breathed and it won't slow down, heat up, and burn away objects that pass through it like earth's atmosphere. This means that when the earth and moon pass through an asteroid field the earth is protected while the moon just gets slammed over and over again.

On top of that, the earth has geological activity such as erosion which can erase the signs of old meteor impacts. The moon doesn't have this so every time a meteor strikes, the crater remains there until another meteor hits and obscures or covers it up with another crater.

3

kirklennon t1_iy4gxj9 wrote

  1. The moon itself. It's a pretty big thing in its own right with its own gravitational field, and it's orbiting around Earth. A lot of things that would hit our planet end up hitting our moon instead because it's out there playing defense.
  2. The atmosphere. If it's not big enough, it just burns up, and even if it is big, it's both smaller and slower by the time it makes it to the surface, both resulting in smaller craters. When the moon gets hit, it's full-size and full-speed.
  3. Weather and plate tectonics. The surface of Earth is changing all the time and even a huge crater will eventually disappear. Craters on the moon more or less just stay that way until another crater lands in the same area and makes a new overlapping crater.
3

PckMan t1_iy4i87e wrote

The vast majority of space rocks crashing down towards Earth is vaporised into dust by the immense temperatures generated by the friction with the atmosphere. Pieces rarely reach the Earth's surface and they're usually tiny if they do. That being said bigger meteorites do impact the Earth, like the one in Russia a few years ago, usually though they fall into the ocean.

There are craters on the Earth too, it's just that most of them are not easily visible since they're usually overgrown with trees and plants. By contrast the moon has no atmosphere or an active eco system so not only does it get a lot more impacts but all the craters are very easy to see.

3

willvasco t1_iy4gk95 wrote

Lots of reasons, but primarily because of our atmosphere. Lots of things try to hit Earth, but get burnt up on the way down. That, and our landscape has so many other factors acting on it (weather, tectonic plates, things living on it) that what craters do form can quickly be worn away.

2

cavalier78 t1_iy4hhfl wrote

The Moon has no air. So that means if an asteroid hits it, it leaves a crater. Then there's nothing to get rid of that crater. It just stays and stays forever.

The Earth has air. And volcanoes. And plants. And water. So if an asteroid landed in the middle of Ohio ten thousand years ago, that's ten thousand years of rain and wind and stuff to get rid of the crater. It might still be there, but it'll look a lot more like a natural valley now. Floods and rivers and tornadoes will knock down some of the hard ridges, and trees and plants and things will gradually soften the landscape as well.

Plus the atmosphere acts like a shield, burning up most asteroids before they cause big impacts. So something that causes a big crater on the Moon will cause a really small crater on Earth, and something that causes a small crater on the Moon will never even hit ground on Earth.

1

HappyFailure t1_iy4s0kd wrote

A lot of people are mentioning the Earth's atmosphere here, and it just isn't that big of a factor for sizable impactors over history. Yes, it keeps dust-sized particles from making a constant stream of micro-craters, and stops the fist-sized rocks from making small craters, but even Venus with 90 times Earth's atmosphere doesn't stop any craters bigger than about 2 km from being formed.

Okay, we wouldn't be seeing many craters bigger than the atmospheric cutoff being formed today because the influx of such objects is currently very small, but if we could have had the protection of our atmosphere while somehow turning off erosion/volcanism/tectonism for the past 4.5 billion years, then we would look (from a distance) as cratered as the Moon does--only when looking at small scales would we notice the difference.

1

anewleaf1234 t1_iy72w2p wrote

Earth has an atmosphere where lots of that stuff burns up.

The moon doesn't.

Also there is erosion and weathering happening on the Earth. That's not happening on the moon.

1