Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SpaceMonkee8O t1_iy660ev wrote

Yeah that’s the main difference.

2

As_TheHoursPass t1_iy6zc2j wrote

It may not be. Chicxulub is absolutely massive but not visible from a normal satellite. It's been eroded by time. When you consider just how gargantuan that planet killer was, it gives erosion and plate tectonics a much stronger argument.

It wasn't even that long ago from a planetery age viewpoint, given its size.

1

SpaceMonkee8O t1_iy6znti wrote

Granted our planet is much more geologically active and that definitively plays a part, but I feel like erosion is largely an atmospheric phenomenon.

1