Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Bensemus t1_j6ntwih wrote

Reply to comment by Aevum1 in ELI5: Why is having a lower refresh rate on a display better for battery? by NotJoeMama727

> but since its so fast you dont notice.

Ho boy is interlaced ever noticeable. When it first came out it was an upgrade but now if people watch interlaced content they will really notice how poor moving images are.

2

NickyXIII t1_j6oqtl2 wrote

It's much less noticable in motion when using an analog interlaced display than when using a modern digital progressive display. Interlaced is absolutely worse, but that is exactly why once we could logistically make progressive happen we did

2