Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mingus-dew t1_iuht6nb wrote

Hmm, perhaps it's to regulate and manage where the recordings are stored. If they're on random laptops that could be compromised/hacked/stolen the fallout from that could be really bad.

Maybe the recordings are still available to be accessed etc with the right permission.

17

Crotchless_Panties t1_iuhtzrg wrote

I'll buy that... If you give me a steep discount.

I think it's outrageous that they can record it, but no one else can.

−3

mingus-dew t1_iuhzd5i wrote

I mean, I'm just some random person speculating on the internet. I have no idea why that's their policy. But would you trust a lawyer who can't turn off a kitten face filter with securing a video recording of your court hearing on their home computer? Or would you be worried if your opponent in court was allowed to have a recording of your case and any of your testimony?

9

Crotchless_Panties t1_iui9xbs wrote

You make valid points, but I was viewing this from the perspective that they were going to say stuff that they didn't want you to record, because it could be used against them later.

I worked for FedEx once, and they did that shit constantly!

−1

mingus-dew t1_iuimk42 wrote

>[...] they were going to say stuff that they didn't want you to record, because it could be used against them later.

But this is a public court with an ostensibly neutral judge with counsel from both plantiff and defendant... Who is "they"?

9