mingus-dew t1_iuht6nb wrote
Reply to comment by Crotchless_Panties in For Halloween I'm not a cat. by Greenwing
Hmm, perhaps it's to regulate and manage where the recordings are stored. If they're on random laptops that could be compromised/hacked/stolen the fallout from that could be really bad.
Maybe the recordings are still available to be accessed etc with the right permission.
Crotchless_Panties t1_iuhtzrg wrote
I'll buy that... If you give me a steep discount.
I think it's outrageous that they can record it, but no one else can.
mingus-dew t1_iuhzd5i wrote
I mean, I'm just some random person speculating on the internet. I have no idea why that's their policy. But would you trust a lawyer who can't turn off a kitten face filter with securing a video recording of your court hearing on their home computer? Or would you be worried if your opponent in court was allowed to have a recording of your case and any of your testimony?
Crotchless_Panties t1_iui9xbs wrote
You make valid points, but I was viewing this from the perspective that they were going to say stuff that they didn't want you to record, because it could be used against them later.
I worked for FedEx once, and they did that shit constantly!
mingus-dew t1_iuimk42 wrote
>[...] they were going to say stuff that they didn't want you to record, because it could be used against them later.
But this is a public court with an ostensibly neutral judge with counsel from both plantiff and defendant... Who is "they"?
Crotchless_Panties t1_iuimr81 wrote
If I knew who 'they' were, I wouldn't need to call them 'they'.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments