AadamAtomic t1_j7hkqrx wrote
>All existing iPads and MacBooks are equipped with backlit LCD displays, whereas OLED displays have self-emitting pixels and do not require backlighting, allowing for higher contrast ratio.
Welcome to 2015 Apple.
Edit: here's a cheap Samsung tablet with an AMOLED screen.
AMOLED and OLED have been the standard for a while, and about to move on to QLed...
APPLE only serves you the old crap. It's NEW to YOU.
kjlo5 t1_j7imz2n wrote
“QLED” is a backlit LCD technology. Not an improvement over OLED because it’s not using emissive pixels. “QD-OLED” and “Micro-LED” would be an upgrade to OLED and more of a direct comparison.
Apple holds several Micro-LED patents. I suspect they will have a competitive advantage in Micro-LED display tech once the world inevitably shifts to that technology as a replacement of OLED.
AadamAtomic t1_j7ji9ec wrote
>QLED” is a backlit LCD technology
No it's not OLED is self lit, like pixel led lights.... LCD is "liquid crystal display" and needs back light shined onto it.
You are correct that Samsung has something even higher quality than that though, but it won't become standard for 10 years or so. It's not even on the main market yet.
Edit: backlit Screens can't fold and roll up like the new Phones, tablets and TV'S...... THEY ARE NOT BACKLIT BECAUSE THEY CAN DO ALL THESE THINGS.
AvengedFADE t1_j7jlfkm wrote
This article makes some very heavy wrong implications.
LED TV’s only refer to the backlight, in fact, all TV’s marketed as LED’s are simply just LCD screen’s with LED backlights, instead of fluorescent backlights. This includes QLED display’s. LED and QLED TV’s are not “self emissive” where each pixel is it’s own light source, and these types of panels still require a separate light source. There are many different kinds of backlights found on these types of screens these days, including Edge Lit, FALD (Full-Array Local Dimming), and Mini-LED, are all different forms of backlighting technology, found in LED TV’s which use a Liquid Crystal Display.
https://www.popsci.com/reviews/qled-vs-oled-vs-mini-led/?amp
https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/qled-vs-oled/
OLED screens, on the other hand, are entirely “self emissive” where each individual pixel is it’s own light source, and can produce enough nits on its own to not require a backlight.
In practical terms an LED TV would mean each pixel is its own LED, but the industry at this point as I explained is only referring to the backlight technology of those LCD panels. The industry has coined an entirely different term for this kind of television, where each individual pixel is in fact, an LED, and capable of producing its own light.
This technology or panel type is known as “Micro-LED”, which is a very promising technology, however is still in the early “prototyping phase”. Displays can cost upwards of $100,000 USD currently, and are currently very large (over 100” for a 4K variant). They are currently now starting to produce sizes as small as 75”, but they are not 4K and close to HD/QHD. It will still be a while before you can purchase a 4K 60hz panel in a 65” at affordable prices.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jmmkt wrote
You are still wrong my Dude.
OLED TV's exist, they are just Super expensive, And why we aren't talking about TVs. Most people don't have an OLED TV.
OLED literally stands for "Organic Light Emitting Diodes."
That's how OLED TVs like this exist.
Where is the Back light at? lol
OLED TV's are literally just self lit screens with a silicone matrix board behind them encased in plastic.
moxTR t1_j7jpirk wrote
Micro LED is not OLED, it’s more comparable to mini LED but with individual pixel “zones”. Micro LED does not exist in the consumer space at this time. This level can be confusing, but you’re conflating a lot of the terms here. QD OLED is also distinct from QLED, the latter is not comparable to mini/micro LED or OLED technologies.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jr16d wrote
>Micro LED is not OLED
AMOLED IS NOT MICRO LED... What is your point and why bring up future tech completely unrelated?
>Micro LED does not exist in the consumer space at this time.
They exist in the Business space.
mLED is very new, and completely unrelated to this discussion. Apple and probably won't have mLED for the next 20 years that their current rate of adoption. Lol
AvengedFADE t1_j7jqffp wrote
I have an OLED TV, I own an LG G2.
An organic LED, and a traditional LED (non-organic) are two very different things.
A QLED screen is just an LCD screen, with an LED backlight, as well as Quantum dots within the LCD panel. LED TV’s are not “self lit” as you so claim, and all LED TV’s still use a backlight, while the panel is either a VA or IPS LCD screen.
The only two TV technologies that are self emissive are OLED (including Samsung’s QD-OLED, RGB OLED with quantum dot layer, and LG’s WRGB OLED, OLED with extra white subpixel), and Micro-LED (uses regular LED’s and Gallium Nitirde, rather than traditional organic compounds which are carbon based that deteriorate with use).
Mini-LED, LED, QLED etc all still use LCD panels, and backlights, and because of that are obviously NOT self emissive.
OLED (QD-OLED & WRGB OLED) as well as Micro-LED, are the only two self emissive technologies.
OLED & LED are two very different technologies and light sources. The OP you were replying too has been correct this whole time, you were the only ones who has the wrong info.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jrlfj wrote
>LED TV’s are not “self lit” as you so claim
Im well aware that Apple still uses LED in their tablets. That's what this entire post is about.
OLED and AMOLED are self lit, as I have been saying.
I understand that some TVs have a backlight assist for watching in direct sunlight, But completely transparent screens are only possible because of OLEDs.
AvengedFADE t1_j7js32s wrote
QLED” is a backlit LCD technology
“No it's not LED is self lit, like pixel led lights.... LCD is "liquid crystal display" and needs back light shined onto it.
You are correct that Samsung has something even higher quality than that though, but it won't become standard for 10 years or so. It's not even on the main market yet.”
That is your quote sir.
You literally tried to argue that LED TV are self lit (they are not, the LED is in the backlight only) and that QLED wasn’t backlit LCD technology. Samsung makes a load of QLED TV’s, which all have backlights (either Mini-LED, or FALD). Only QD-OLED, does not have a backlight (again QLED and QD-OLED are two very different technologies)
True TV’s that use self lit LED’s at the pixel level (self emissive) would be mLED or Micro LED (hence why it’s called micro LED), which doesn’t exist yet in consumer form. Organic LED’s are not the same as regular LED’s and are two very different kinds of lighting technologies.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jsfxp wrote
I meant to type OLED... You know, the thing that's being discussed? Like the last 2 comments you replied too?
You're basing your entire argument on a typo that's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
AMOLED is better than LED and LCD. THATS what is being discussed here.
AvengedFADE t1_j7jsz2x wrote
Man your the one who argued it, it’s not even a typo. You even presented a whole argument to the person you replied too.
Your confusing QLED and QD-OLED, that’s not a typo, your convoluting two different technologies as one..
QLED is backlit LCD technology, and your the one who wrote up a whole statement to the OP saying he was wrong. Currently there are no consumer self emissive LED TV’s, mLED is trying to change that (again an organic LED is not the same as traditional LED’s which use non-organic compounds). How is that not relevant to the conversation?
Edit: You can edit your comment and it’s still wrong, as the OP said QLED is just LCD with backlight, which it is.
Again QD-OLED, and QLED (which is what OP said), are two different things. QD-OLED doesn’t need a backlight (as OLED are self-emissive), but QLED’s do require a backlight, and are simply just LCD panels, with a QD layer and either FALD or Mini-LED backlighting.
He even said in the OP that QD-OLED is self emissive, you need to re-read the comment you responded too.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jtl94 wrote
No one is talking about Quantum Dot displays...
AvengedFADE t1_j7jtumt wrote
Dude you literally tried to dirty edit the comment, and make it seem like you weren’t wrong, but it still makes you wrong.
The OP you responded too was talking about Quantum Dots.
“QLED is a backlit LCD technology” is correct, no matter how much you try to edit or sugar coat it. You literally said “no it’s not.” The very person you responded too was talking about Quantum Dots, so I guess your wrong again.
https://www.unddit.com/r/gadgets/comments/10vbnmt/_/j7ji9ec/#comment-info
AadamAtomic t1_j7julrz wrote
What does any of that have to do with QD displays or the post on general?... Oh... Right.... Nothing.
AvengedFADE t1_j7k0mj7 wrote
QLED’s are Quantum dot displays. That’s what the Q in QLED stands for.
https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/qled
Do I really need a dictionary definition to explain this? If your going to argue about it with someone, then clearly it’s important to the conversation to correct someone when they are wrong.
AadamAtomic t1_j7k11h8 wrote
>QD-OLED
>QLED’s are Quantum dot displays.
You can't even keep up with your own comments, I don't expect you to keep up with what I'm telling you.
No one is talking about QD other than you. I don't even know why you brought it into the conversation unless you just want to make an example of more technology Apple won't have.
AvengedFADE t1_j7k1m44 wrote
QD OLED’s are also quantum dot displays, QLED’s are also quantum dot display.
QLED’s are LCD panels with a quantum dot substrate, and an LED backlights (either FALD or mini-LED).
To quote PC mag definition “QLED (Quantum dot LED): A display technology that uses phosphorescent crystals to improve the LED backlight on an LCD TV.
https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/qled
QD OLED, are OLED panels, with a quantum dot substrate applied. The OLED transistors are capable of their own light (blue light), and hence do not require a backlight, and the QD are what create the red and green light.
Pc mag definition “QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED): An OLED display technology that uses quantum dots as the color creators. When the blue backlight hits the red and green quantum dot subpixels, red and green are generated. Because blue is the backlight, it serves as the blue subpixel. See quantum dot.
https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/qd-oled
QD OLED, and QLED are two different display technologies entirely. However Quantum Dots themselves can be applied to more than one screen technology, both LED/LCD TV’s and OLED’s can benefit from this technology, and does not refer to the panel type itself. It is simply a coating.
If your thinking of TV’s which use the quantum dots themselves as a light source (no need for OLED’s, LED’s, LCD’s or a backlight entirely), these are known as NanoLED, or EL-QDLED (Electroluminescent Quantum Dot LED) named after the creator of the company who makes Quantum Dots, Nanosys.
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1674203061
It’s truly hard to keep up with your lack of knowledge on this subject to be completely frank.
AadamAtomic t1_j7k1qq4 wrote
I know what Quantum dot displays are.
I'm saying they're completely irrelevant to this conversation and your entire argument based on irrelevant information.
You want to talk about quantum physics while we're here too?
Nothing you have said has anything to do with AMOLED or mini-LED BEING USED IN TABLETS.
AvengedFADE t1_j7k23vf wrote
It’s not irrelevant to the conversation, when your the one who tried arguing it in the first place. Like I’m not an expert in quantum physics, but we’re talking about TV’s here man, hardly a complex subject, but you tried to come out like an expert, and then argued this
OP - “QLED” is a backlit LCD technology (True)
AadamAtonic - “No it's not LED is self lit, like pixel led lights.... (False when talking about TV’s/display technologies). LCD is "liquid crystal display" and needs back light shined onto it.
You are correct that Samsung has something even higher quality than that though, but it won't become standard for 10 years or so. It's not even on the main market yet.”
That was wrong bro, just admit it. Even changing your sentence to OLED from LED still makes it wrong.
[deleted] t1_j7kcank wrote
[removed]
Cracked_Guy t1_j7ia00n wrote
Don’t downvote this person.
Kenban65 t1_j7jgi61 wrote
That cheap Samsung tablet that you linked uses a cheap TFT screen not AMOLED. The old A8 phone used an AMOLED screen.
[deleted] t1_j7jjpll wrote
[removed]
jefferyuniverse t1_j7i0osq wrote
Apple’s displays are still amazing even without being OLED
Mhugs05 t1_j7ify9k wrote
As someone with an xdr 12.9 pro, I can easily say it isn’t even in the same league as my s95b qd oled tv.
One-Gap-3915 t1_j7jszu7 wrote
I just followed that link and
> A screen everyone will love
>Galaxy Tab A8 features a vivid 10.5'' LCD screen
It’s LCD not AMOLED
AadamAtomic t1_j7jtu45 wrote
It's the Galaxy S8..... Not the A8...
I Just deleted a little bit of code at the end of the link which I think rerouted the link, it should show the correct tablet now.
Newest ipad= $1,200 for old ass Mini-LED.
SM Tablet from last year= $599 for an even bigger, better AMOLED display, expandable memory, and more powerful.
[deleted] t1_j7irl4k wrote
[removed]
656666_ t1_j7jhq0e wrote
Apple used mini led as well, also the old amoled Samsungs where trash, burn in and shit. Also the iPhones have Oled. They are always a bit behind, that’s true. The Color of the first Samsung amoleds was HORRIBLE
AadamAtomic t1_j7jj19g wrote
>Apple used mini led as well
No they don't. All apple tablets use LCD displays manufactured by Samsung. (Hence the post.)
it even says this in the article, and why Apple is moving away from the LCD.
phychi t1_j7jkwrd wrote
they use mini led in Macbook pro and on their very expensive external screen I think.
moxTR t1_j7jp52v wrote
The iPad Pro 12.9 has used mini LED for the last two models.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jqgv0 wrote
"MINI LED^^backlite** DISPLAY! "
They use clever marketing to trick you. The LEDs that light up the LCD screen are mini... The LCD screen itself is not a mini LED screen..
The iPad Pro 12.9 uses bullshit words like " liquid retina XDR display" which is just fancy for saying, "Liquid Crystal half-assed Hdr Display. (LCD/LCxD)
Ipads and iphones still stuffer from Burn in like old ass TV's.
This is another reason Apple is changing their screens finally.
moxTR t1_j7jr1nm wrote
I have no clue what you’re talking about. The page you’ve linked correctly states the 12.9 inch iPad Pro uses a mini LED display. Yes, it is backlit, that is a tenet of mini LED technology. All mini LED displays are backlit, that’s how it works.
[deleted] t1_j7js7gf wrote
[removed]
AadamAtomic t1_j7jt5uo wrote
>All mini LED displays are backlit, that’s how it works.
That's not how OLED or AMOLED screens work... You know? The things that are currently being discussed in this conversation.
Apple has shitty old Mini-LED tech for $1,200..cool??
Why not get a brand new, top of the line AMOLED tablet with larger screen and more power for only $800?
Mattcheco t1_j7jtqua wrote
Retina means it meets certain PPI targets I believe.
AadamAtomic t1_j7ju79w wrote
PPI is literally the quality of the display.
Apple displays are not True definition and use software upscaling to make it look good on screen.
This is why iPhone photos look great on other iPhones but look kind of shitty when posted online or viewed on a computer. (Comparatively to other cameras)
This is also why images received from Android users look like shit on iPhone screens, and the iPhone users simply think Android phones send bad photos ironically. Lol
Mattcheco t1_j7ju9oj wrote
It’s pixels per inch. Nothing to do with quality, certain PPI values qualify it as “Retina” for Apple.
AadamAtomic t1_j7juvn5 wrote
>It’s pixels per inch. Nothing to do with quality
My sweet summer child. Play around with the PPI on a computer display, and then come back and tell me it has
Mattcheco t1_j7jv03f wrote
PPI is the relationship between resolution and screen size. Nothing to do with quality. This is why a phone or laptop with a 4k screen is ridiculous.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jvb5t wrote
>PPI is the relationship between resolution and screen size.
CORRECT! Together they both make "quality".
This circles back to my previous comment about Apple having weird ass displays and having them downscale their images with the iOS software!
This has been common knowledge for a Long time.
Mattcheco t1_j7jzmj6 wrote
Fidelity is what you’re looking for. Not a fan of Apple but their “weird ass displays” is a feature not a bug. It means you get very acceptable PPI without the bullshit advertising around resolution. See 4k phones etc etc.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments