Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

rpkarma t1_j7oeyv5 wrote

18

SpecialNose9325 t1_j7oyjbk wrote

I get that the ars technica article said that, but kinda odd that they provided no screenshots and no other source has said the same thing. Im starting to get skeptical about there being only one unverified source for this.

3

rpkarma t1_j7p33f0 wrote

I mean I personally hope it’s bullshit, as that’s ridiculous. Or that if it is true, that the pressure from the media gets Samsung to trim it down.

0

SpecialNose9325 t1_j7p4f1g wrote

I wouldnt put it past Samsung to screw up like that, but they do often fix stuff if they get backlash. Id assume people with 128gb phones will be the loudest criticism.

2

shipmaster1995 t1_j9nsp08 wrote

Just scrolling and know this is an old thread, but that ars article was proven to be wrong. The actual OS system only takes 12.5 gigs because of the way that Samsung calculates storage uses by default (it counts all apps as 'system' for some reason)

1