Submitted by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1 t3_zpqyp8 in gadgets
EstablishmentShoddy1 t1_j0vnt8l wrote
Reply to comment by foxhelp in ChatGPT allows this AI typewriter to talk to you by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
fair but you can still paraphrase chatgpt and your fine. Half the time essays are hard to due to writer’s block
andrenikous t1_j0vtefw wrote
"Just make sure you change some of the words and move stuff around so it doesn't look like you copied me."
gender_nihilism t1_j0vtn6n wrote
then you're just using a tool. honestly, what's the problem? if you review it, edit it, and expand on it while verifying it, you've saved yourself a lot of grunt work while still doing everything actually important: the actual thinking. I use it for scenes in stories I write. I take the output, rewrite it as if I were editing my own writing, et voilà, free writer's block clearance.
checker280 t1_j0vykkv wrote
It was always less how much you remembered and recalled, and more knowing where to look for the info and what info to look for.
foxhelp t1_j0w1czd wrote
Curious as a writer what you thought about the guy that made the kids book using AI?
gender_nihilism t1_j0w89fu wrote
not the same. using an ai image generator is different because you're not deriving your work from the output, but rather just publishing the output. I'm not making a judgement here, except that they're emphatically not the same thing.
abraxasisall t1_j0vubxc wrote
This is going to be what I find impossible to prevent; paraphrasing it and rewriting it slightly in your own words. I suppose one way to check it would be to have another program input a bunch of prompts and compare the original essay for likeness, in the same way that there are programs already that scour scholarly works on the web and compare for likeness; except this time it’s testing AI outputs.
Now if only it could write mathematical proofs for me..
Edit: it can fucking write proofs
EstablishmentShoddy1 t1_j0w2cen wrote
Yeah I heard the AI isn't really sophisticated for math
abraxasisall t1_j1180fo wrote
They’re wrong, it can write proofs perfectly. I think it has limited characters (ASCII) available to express certain concepts however; if it could freely use laTex I think it would be able to accomplish exactly what we’re discussing.
I asked it to prove all kinds of math problems ranging from simple (using mathematical induction, direct proof, contradiction to prove things) to complex (prove certain functions f: Z -> Z are injective, surjective, or bijective (both), prove that the cardinality of Z, set of all integers, is less than R, set of all real numbers) and in the cases I tried, the proofs were sufficient. Remarkable.
verluci t1_j0w64zc wrote
*you're
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments