Submitted by thebelsnickle1991 t3_zv14ci in gadgets
mdoom23 t1_j1on41n wrote
Reply to comment by Yeetus_McSendit in Samsung develops industry’s first 12nm-Class DDR5 DRAM by thebelsnickle1991
Well transistors vs capacitors.
But if you really want your mind blown, the "5 nm process" isn't actually transistors that are 5nm in length. These numbers are more marketing terms and names of distinct generations more than actual physical dimensions.
In fact, the 5nm generation of CPUs actually are closer to transistors that are 35-40 nm in length.
The physical dimensions and the names haven't really been aligned in nearly three decades.
Drives me nuts. So misleading.
gramathy t1_j1pdsvt wrote
is 5 nm the resolution of the process? So the transistors aren't 5 nm, but creating a usable semiconductor structure requires precision on the order of 5 nm
andynator1000 t1_j1pf6en wrote
“5nm” is not related in any way to feature size or precision. It’s just a marketing name for the manufacturing process that followed “7nm”.
FreeLegendaries t1_j1pnlmi wrote
what happens after 1nm
[deleted] t1_j1pwiw3 wrote
[deleted]
BezniaAtWork t1_j1uwn3h wrote
1mm One™, 1mm One™ X™, 1mm Series™ X™
danielv123 t1_j1ppqhj wrote
For Intel, 18A.
TroubledEmo t1_j1ptgat wrote
I think we‘re hitting max of physics there.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments