Submitted by _Nova_Corps t3_123oxz1 in gaming

Hi everyone, I want to play a good FPS and the one I’ve had my eyes on is Borderlands, thing is I’ve only got The Handsome Edition and that comes with the 2nd one and the Pre Sequel. I was just wondering if I need to play the first Borderlands before playing the second one.

33

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CedartheTree t1_jdvjfrp wrote

I'd just watch a recap video of the first game. There are some good moments, but the gameplay of 2 is far better.

69

JoelsCaddy t1_jdvjlkv wrote

You don’t need to. The first one shows it’s age a bit. 2 does a good job at re introducing all the key characters. I would say it’s worth playing 1 at some point though, but it will feel bare bones compared to 2.

13

LastOfOz t1_jdvjmim wrote

The characters in BL2, presequel and BL1 are completely different except for a couple characters (in BL2 one of the people who guides you and gives you quests is the character you play in BL1), however, I wouldn't say its mandatory to play BL1 first.. the 2nd one is the best game out of them all in my opinion. Definitevly a very good fun game.

1

uphill-bothways t1_jdvk8vi wrote

BL1 with all the DLC was pretty great. I remember more of that game than most I've played. If you're going to play it at all, definitely play it first. I'd say it's worth it if you can.

11

umassmza t1_jdvk99t wrote

The playable characters in 1 are the characters giving you missions in 2. You don’t miss much in terms of story by playing 2 first, and 2 has a much much more detailed story anyway.

There’s no in-game benefit to playing them in order, and honestly you can skip 1 completely, 2 is a better game.

7

Amazingawesomator t1_jdvlfrx wrote

I have played 2. Have not played the others. It was a wonderful experience.

1

aaronite t1_jdvm3v0 wrote

Go straight to 2. 1 is fine but 2 is a classic.

5

Xano74 t1_jdvp7un wrote

You don't really have to. There's going to be characters and references from the first game you might miss, but who plays BL for the story anyway.

It's worth a playthrough though just because the classes feel different.

2

da_muffin_man_12 t1_jdvpbsp wrote

Nope, you'll be good. It wouldn't hurt to watch a quick summary of the first one though. The second is one of the funniest games of all time. Tina is very likely going to be your favorite character. Idk if the dungeons and dragons DLC is included (I'd hope so at this point), but make sure to play it. That is one of the few DLCs I've ever bought that I felt was well worth the money.

2

[deleted] t1_jdvpnki wrote

not really. you could watch a quick recap on youtube or something. the first one really was just kind of a disjoined collection of stories. even at the beginning of two they give you a recap of one that honestly is probably good enough. there's just some characters that pop up that you are supposed to recognize but many of their personalities are kind of new for two and really weren't fleshed out in 1 anyways.

2

Yabanjin t1_jdvqyym wrote

While Borderlands is a good game, Borderlands 2 is much better, I would recommend playing through all of BL2, and if you like that a lot, then you might think of BL1. There is not enough plot points missing form the first game that you will feel lost in the second game. Make sure to try out the BL2 DLC tha is all includied in the handome edition, it is really good, and has really good loot.

2

Drauxus t1_jdvrbjx wrote

I've seen like 40 minutes of bl1 game play whereas I've beaten bl2 many times. The games all take place in the same universe and generally follow the same characters but each has it's own self contained story (if you even pay attention to it)

2

JJ4prez t1_jdvs8g3 wrote

I'd go for the first one and get the enhanced edition. It's my favorite, even if it was less than 2. It's a classically good game, and the charm is what made everyone fall in love with it.

2

mycatiscoolerthenme t1_jdvsn30 wrote

The gunplay is better in 2 and on BUUUT 1 is vry good and the characters are awesome

U dnt need to play it like I never did at first, it's sorta loosely connected by just the fact that ur all vault hunters and Marcus drives you at the beginning

2

420Pussy_Destroyer69 t1_jdvspcl wrote

BL is one of those weird franchises where I feel the DLCs stories are considerably better than the mains for the most part

Like for BL1 the Robot Revolution and General Knoxx DLCs are fantastic, BL2 has the Scarlett DLC and Assault on Dragon Keep, TPS with Claptastic Voyage DLC, and BL3 with the Fuster Cluck, Bounty of Blood and Handsome Jackpot DLCs

2

MrSloppyPants t1_jdvtwyt wrote

You don't have to play the first one. The gameplay is quite different between the first and the others. Start with 2 and then if you're really hooked, you can go back and play the first one

2

ZombieTheRogue t1_jdvwgj7 wrote

I'd recommend playing them both starting with 1. The secret armory of general knoxx dlc for the first game is one of the best dlcs ever. Its a fantastic chill game.

BL2 has a lot more enemy variety. Of course. They stepped it up with their second installment.

1

Hey_look_new t1_jdvwidj wrote

need to? no, absolutely not

the first one is pretty alright tho, and should be played

but bl2 is pretty awesome, and all teh DLC is pretty great

the DLC for the first game is a bit lacklustre in comparison

but if you ever intend to play the first, I would play it first

it'll feel.....lacking if you go back to it after getting used to BL2

1

RockMystic909 t1_jdvxlw4 wrote

I would recommend playing the first game. It has aged, but it's not the worst. Playing the first game will also help give a proper connection to the characters rather than just watching all the cutscenes. And it would help cement the world, which does circle back a little bit in 2. Seeing the actual difference firsthand is more impactful than just playing 2.

1

Crazy_Canuck78 t1_jdw0em0 wrote

You're not missing much really.... BL2 stands on its own very well. Easily has one of the best antagonists of any game, in any genre, let alone fps'.

BL3 makes great strides in gameplay over BL2... but the story and writing in 2 are still FAR better than 3.

1

kronicfeld t1_jdw20y2 wrote

Play them in order.

The first is a little “clunkier,” but the playable characters from one show up as NPC/story characters in two, and it is immeasurably more emotionally resonant - sometimes positively, sometimes negatively - when you have played as them previously.

1

A_Listening_Ear t1_jdw3nfm wrote

My first game was bl2. Didn’t play 1 till way after and I just rushed though it to finish it. 2 is by far the best out of the series. 3 is good but not better than 2. You probably won’t like playing 1 if you play 2 first.

2

lazergun-pewpewpew t1_jdw4oq4 wrote

One thing you should know about borderlands is that most people dont play it for the story.

The second game has an amazing vilain but the stories themselves are usualy your classic "defeat the bad guy" cliche. Its also a lot of juvenile humor wich sometimes work and sometimes don't.

The games dont take themselves very seriously and neither should you. Just watch a recap of the first game and play the second.

1

Big-Fruit330 t1_jdw5aj4 wrote

You don't need to play the first you could watch a video in saying that the first one is a good game .but I he second is the best in the series

2

G-Flo189 t1_jdw68zc wrote

Skip BL1, play BL2, then pre sequel. Then if you really need more, consider either going back to BL1 or go to BL3. Just know that both of these options will not be as good as BL2

1

dman2846 t1_jdw8a4r wrote

I've played BL2 for 100's of hours and enjoyed every second of it, despite me knowing literally nothing about BL1. It's definitely fine to jump straight into BL2.

1

Radiant_Rage t1_jdwdxk7 wrote

This... Borderlands 1 is sluggish and unrefined compared to 2, the writing and humour is on point in 2. The Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep is also one of the best DLCs I've ever played. The pre-sequel is a bad miss in my opinion and has a lot of weird Aussie humour.

8

dmiester55 t1_jdwerxk wrote

I’d recommend Borderlands 2. If you want to be a nigh unkillable psycho bad ass, try Krieg. Do absurd melee damage and hulk out, which refills your health. In that mode it refills your health again every time you kill an enemy. If you activated near death the ability timer resets so you can use it again just as soon as it ends Once you get some abilities and artifacts for synergy and to upgrade the melee damage you’ll be one shotting a lot of tough enemies. Even if you’re fighting a boss monster that you have no hope of beating, if they spawn smaller minions throughout the fight you can space out killing them to keep yourself alive as long as possible. you can play solo be practically invincible in most situations.

1

Legitimate_Page t1_jdwf3sp wrote

You 100% don't need to play the first to enjoy the second, but I can summarize the first game's important plot beats in a few sentences.

The "vault" you thought had valuable treasure in, was actually a giant, unbelievably powerful ancient alien being. Some people want to harness the power for EEVVVILLL, or whatever, namely the gun manufacturers, and more specifically for the first game, Atlus.

1

GreatKangaroo t1_jdwfi6r wrote

My intro to the series (and looter shooters) was Broadlands 2 on the PS3. I ported my save to The handsome collection, and had no idea about the story from 1.

As other suggest a story recap would be more then sufficient. I did a single playthrough of the Pre-Sequel, but had the most fun and enjoyment playing Borderlands 3.

1

GreatKangaroo t1_jdwfitt wrote

My intro to the series (and looter shooters) was Broadlands 2 on the PS3. I ported my save to The handsome collection, and had no idea about the story from 1.

As other suggest a story recap would be more then sufficient. I did a single playthrough of the Pre-Sequel, but had the most fun and enjoyment playing Borderlands 3.

1

Turbulent_Winter549 t1_jdwiorm wrote

I loved the shit out of BL2 and tried going back later to play BL1 but the missing quality of life stuff turned me off. For example you have to click to pick up EVERY bit of cash that drops whereas in BL2 you auto picked it up by walking over it

1

AdventurousAd9531 t1_jdwtg8y wrote

I don't even think the game was that bad! They did interesting things with the skill trees like seeing Wilhelm slowly transforming into a machine and claptrap being... Claptrap..

Much better than the skill trees we got for borderlands 3, which had the best weapons of any borderlands game to date.

2

GlockAmaniacs t1_jdwv1rc wrote

Skip one. It's fun but did get a bit boring.

2nd and above are all cool af. 2nd being the best

1

TheNewTonyBennett t1_jdxguu3 wrote

Need? no. It may help flesh out the stories of the characters some, though and really what you could do is watch the cutscenes for 1 on youtube and you should be ready and all set for 2.

Great games, TONS of content

1

Zuam9 t1_jdxov27 wrote

I only ever played 2, wanted to play 3 but I got busy and couldn’t find the time and now I just don’t want to.

2 is great though, don’t need to play 1 to understand anything really.

1

FallenShadeslayer t1_jdy3akc wrote

BL1 is way better than either of those in my opinion, but I know most people here will vehemently disagree so do with that what you will. It’s just my opinion.

Regardless, to answer your question you don’t need to play the first one but I’d highly recommend it.

1

BunkysFather1978 t1_jdz4jji wrote

I enjoyed BL1 and BL2 to be fair, agree that the pre-sequel wasn’t great. BL3 was a blast!

1

ConfusedPanda76 t1_jdzldk4 wrote

1 was a fun game and I sunk a bunch of hours into it but you won't be required to play it to enjoy 2.

Now, if you play 1 first it will make you appreciate 2 even more for how much better the plot, gameplay and graphics are though.

1

East_Train6615 t1_je0fnnv wrote

Borderlands 2 is one of my favorite games .... the rest meh .... 1 has a meh story and good game play, 2 is just phenomenal... 3 just couldn't capture that same magic

1