Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iuj7lb0 wrote
You do you, but MW2 is great.
stitch-is-dope t1_iuj8s96 wrote
It’s a $70 downgrade from MW2019
Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iuj9brf wrote
Meh. To each their own. It’s a lot bigger at launch than MW19 was. Gameplay is less campy because of what they’ve done with perks. And with two years of support it’s going to be the best value for $70 we’ve ever seen in a CoD game.
SweatyPainting6398 t1_iujeryv wrote
The game is still heavily catered towards campers and casuals though, in some ways more than mw 2019.
stitch-is-dope t1_iujgj4c wrote
I’d say more considering they removed stuff like slide cancelling, less people will be as run and gun and instead will be just sitting in corners or slower paced
stitch-is-dope t1_iujgfu9 wrote
$70 but will have battle passes, micro transactions and all sorts of other bullshit
Less campy? I don’t think so dude, if you ask me when I played it for a bit before refunding, it felt even more campy and slow paced and people just hiding in corners.
It felt like dogshit compared to MW2019 somehow and smooth brained gameplay
Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iujhe8t wrote
Cosmetics, sure - like always. They’re entirely optional. So are the Battle Passes. Everything of substance - all weapons and maps - are still included in the base price. I don’t understand people raising a fuss about that sort of thing.
Maybe it’s more campy at lower skill levels? I honestly haven’t seen much of it (outside of Santa Seña - that map is a dumpster fire and I have experienced shotgun corner campers there) - between constant UAVs and drill charges, camping is basically a death sentence.
MW19 was ridiculously campy and there wasn’t much you could do about it. Backlot, Suldal Harbor, Piccadilly…too many rooms with one way in (and that way in has a door) and claymores everywhere.
Like I said, to each their own, but it’s one of the better CoDs we’ve had in a while.
stitch-is-dope t1_iuji30p wrote
Because once upon a time in games like Halo 3 or older call of duties, you could actually unlock the cool cosmetics instead of being a who’s the biggest dumbass with their debit card competition
Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iujiumo wrote
Yup. A decade ago. When map packs set you back $15 each and made the total cost to actually get all the content $120. And there were still loot boxes starting at BlOps2 on top of that. Now you get (in the case of MW2) two years of support, maps, guns, etc. for $70 and if you want cosmetic bullshit, you can buy it (and know what you’re buying when you do - no loot boxes) but it’s still all cosmetic. And let’s be honest - most of those free cosmetics that you could unlock were crap anyway. One more variation on the dozens of camos already available.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments