Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iujhe8t wrote
Reply to comment by stitch-is-dope in Released three unfinished products this year while raking in millions | Activision/Blizzard by [deleted]
Cosmetics, sure - like always. They’re entirely optional. So are the Battle Passes. Everything of substance - all weapons and maps - are still included in the base price. I don’t understand people raising a fuss about that sort of thing.
Maybe it’s more campy at lower skill levels? I honestly haven’t seen much of it (outside of Santa Seña - that map is a dumpster fire and I have experienced shotgun corner campers there) - between constant UAVs and drill charges, camping is basically a death sentence.
MW19 was ridiculously campy and there wasn’t much you could do about it. Backlot, Suldal Harbor, Piccadilly…too many rooms with one way in (and that way in has a door) and claymores everywhere.
Like I said, to each their own, but it’s one of the better CoDs we’ve had in a while.
stitch-is-dope t1_iuji30p wrote
Because once upon a time in games like Halo 3 or older call of duties, you could actually unlock the cool cosmetics instead of being a who’s the biggest dumbass with their debit card competition
Eastbound_Stumptown t1_iujiumo wrote
Yup. A decade ago. When map packs set you back $15 each and made the total cost to actually get all the content $120. And there were still loot boxes starting at BlOps2 on top of that. Now you get (in the case of MW2) two years of support, maps, guns, etc. for $70 and if you want cosmetic bullshit, you can buy it (and know what you’re buying when you do - no loot boxes) but it’s still all cosmetic. And let’s be honest - most of those free cosmetics that you could unlock were crap anyway. One more variation on the dozens of camos already available.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments