jfduval76 t1_j2j633a wrote on January 1, 2023 at 7:03 PM

Reply to comment by bvknight in Me leaving 2022 heading into 2023! by barkingt18

I would still laugh…this is so cheap lol.

ty1771 t1_j2jrsjr wrote on January 1, 2023 at 9:23 PM

I saw it in the theater back in the 90s and everyone laughed because it was so shocking and over the top.

WebMD_PhD t1_j2je4cb wrote on January 1, 2023 at 7:55 PM

Movie is like 20 years old

jfduval76 t1_j2jjq2c wrote on January 1, 2023 at 8:30 PM

And ? Most recent movies suck even more so i don’t understand your point. I still wait for a better Sci-fi movie than Alien and it was made in 1979.

WebMD_PhD t1_j2kqcyx wrote on January 2, 2023 at 1:26 AM

My point is cgi in 1998 was shit compared to todays standards. This was probably pretty good 98. Probably not “cheap” either.

jfduval76 t1_j2l4vcd wrote on January 2, 2023 at 3:17 AM

It’s not the special effect the problem here, it’s the delivery and the editing that’s comedic. I can make an abstraction of the technology of the time for an old movie. Bad editing is still bad. 1993 Jurassic Park CGI didn’t aged that well but it’s still a better movie than all the recent Jurassic World movies.