Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Andrewskiii t1_ithv8ya wrote

they are still my favorite open back under $200. Definitely the most fun Senny I’ve tried because of the bass it provides

5

keynzeev OP t1_ith55e4 wrote

This was my entry in the audiophile world, and for a lot of reasons, I'm still love this and will love to the last day. I don't see too much talk or praise to this guy, and I think that's not fair at all! I like this more than the 600, more than the 6XX and belive it or not, I don't hear much (or any) difference from him to a 660S. He is cheaper than all his brothers, and much easier to drive proppely, has more bass and clarity to me, and continues being one of the best headphones in the world to me, even comparing with my others much more expensive stuff. I did not saw any 58X in the Sennie day, so here is my humble contribution to the king!

4

oxtoacart t1_ithjoc5 wrote

Agreed. I've owned HD600, HD650 and HD58X and the 58X is the only one I've kept.

2

DrXaos t1_itik4ct wrote

How is it different from HD600?

I had expected it to be very similar.

1

oxtoacart t1_itilkt4 wrote

The biggest difference is that the HD600 is much more forward in the upper mids around 3 KHz. I'm pretty sensitive in that area, so it makes the HD600 unpleasant at higher listening volumes. A lesser difference is that the HD58X has better extended and tighter sounding bass, though that might mostly just be because I can comfortably listen a bit louder than with the HD600.

It's been years since I've had the HD600, but I would say that on treble quality (extension and evenness) the HD600 is probably better than the HD58X, so if you listen to a lot of acoustic music, especially string instruments, and you don't mind the shout around 3KHz, the HD600 is probably a better choice.

5

DivineCurrent t1_ithk778 wrote

I also like the 58X better than the other HD6 series. I used the 650 for years, 58X improves upon it with tighter bass and less forward upper midrange. On top of that, I also agree the 660S sound basically the same (except more bass extension on the 58X).

4

NJShadow t1_itiozdm wrote

I would take the 6XX's over the 58X's. I appreciate the warmth with the 58X's, but as soon as you start to crank 'em, they distort pretty badly.

2

Tasunkeo t1_itjve66 wrote

You must be cranking really really hard then, cause that never happened to my pair.

6

Shamblex t1_itku4yp wrote

That stand is wicked. Not very functional though by the looks?

2

keynzeev OP t1_itl5xnn wrote

I use this stand to my LCD 2, he embrace each side of it perfectly from the top and works fine, but in that photo was in that position just for the sake of the cool effect lol.

1

Shamblex t1_itnt0a3 wrote

Cool effect indeed. I was looking at it for 5 minutes trying to figure out the depth of it and of it is still confusing me haha

2

keynzeev OP t1_ituoxur wrote

haha! I will post a photo with the stand fully functional with the LCD 2 later on.

2

abokaky t1_iti34fv wrote

Please help me, I'm going to buy a HD 58X Jubilee headphone and I don't know which one is better for fiio k5 pro or s.m.s.l su-6 sh-6

1

jestercow t1_itiunfq wrote

K5 pro. It’s a dope piece and will drive almost anything.

3

Bear-Grizz t1_iti8txd wrote

Haha solid unit! I dropped mine and dented the mesh all the way up against the driver. Still sounds exactly the same and now with the added dent i know for sure which side is right or left lol.

1