Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Bickster- t1_iwxsxrt wrote

In terms of tonality, I would recommend going to any graph comparison tool, like this one, and adjusting the frequencies to the target, or to your preference, using the Equalizer tool. You can then use any EQ program or app like equalizerAPO or Poweramp for android, and have the IEM sound to your preference. KZ's are notorious for their V-shaped "house sound", so from my experience, I'd definitely recommend eq'ing them.

3

Puzzled-Background-5 t1_iwxxvdd wrote

That neutral tonality is actually a Harman compliant tuning more or less. It's a well researched industry standard. KZ is starting to mature in that regard.

Regarding Harman, though, it's best thought of as a starting point from which one can personalize to their own preferences. The linked article above provides an excellent overview of it... πŸ“±πŸŽ§πŸŽΆπŸŽΆπŸ˜ŽπŸŒƒ

0

mqtpqt t1_iwxxy3t wrote

drivers type doesn't do anything for how a IEM would sound

18

qua2k t1_iwy4fyh wrote

BA drivers are not the problem here.

3

grenklia t1_iwydknk wrote

KZ AS10 are much better

1

FastGecko5 t1_iwygi2i wrote

Driver type doesn't really matter (in this context) but these should EQ really well. I have the CCA C16 which are closely related and they take EQ incredibly well. Give it a try if you haven't.

1

Griffith t1_ix0is6a wrote

This is true, but different drivers have different strengths.

Generally speaking, dynamic drivers are better at producing rich low frequencies and typically BA drivers are better at obtaining a lot of detail but within a much smaller frequency range than dynamic drivers are capable of, which is why we often see earphones with multiple BA drivers.

That isn't to say that a BA driver can't have decent bass, this is not true, nor is it that dynamic drivers can't produce good high frequencies, just that each driver type has different strengths and weaknesses so to say that the driver type doesn't impact the sound or type of sound you're getting is true, but not entirely so.

4