MrMoogyMan t1_j7lr0vc wrote
Reply to comment by Doortofreeside in Would the Allies have kept fighting if the axis powers stopped? by Techno-87
They had planned on it iirc but realized that they would be not have a strategically viable position because of their overextension and the threat from the US. I don't think it's easy to speculate what a IJA invasion of eastern USSR would look like. Would it take pressure off of Hitlers Wehrmacht? Or would it have pushed the US to strike first? The IJN surely would have been very upset about it, and had already thrown their weight around to get rid of Matsuoka in Jul 1941. Japanese military internal rivalry sabotaged a lot of strategic ground operations and planning. I think it would have been disastrous for Japan, regardless of the Soviet response.
cliff99 t1_j7m7imu wrote
Plus attacking the Soviet Union wouldn't have done anything for one of their major problems, which was getting a reliable source of oil.
[deleted] t1_j7mb9yu wrote
[deleted]
MisterBadGuy159 t1_j7moygu wrote
There's an account that Admiral Yamamoto, who led the attack on Pearl Harbor, told his higher-ups that he could guarantee six months where he could actually take home victories, and if the war went on past that, they were screwed. Six months to the day after Pearl Harbor, Japan lost four fleet carriers at the battle of Midway.
treetown1 t1_j7mp0ip wrote
They were working off of the Russo-Japanese war experience - where Tsarist Russia stopped fighting after Mukden and Tsushima.
MrMoogyMan t1_j7mbl83 wrote
I agree. There are oil fields in eastern Russia but they weren't well developed then. They would have never been able to sustain an occupation of the territory in the USSR while holding the rest of their gains in China and SW Asia against the Allies. Maybe the US may have just entered the war on its own at that point. Roosevelt was certainly convinced that war was on the way, and prepared as well as he could for it. Pearl Harbor was basically a gift to the US government for public support against Japan.
TheLateHenry t1_j7m34hx wrote
Yeah, the Japanese Army was stretched thin because of how big China is already, the Soviet Union would have been an impossibility for them to conquer much of.
[deleted] t1_j7mf2l5 wrote
[removed]
OrangeSlimeSoda t1_j7mjsfp wrote
A lot of colonial subjects in Southeast Asia were cautiously optimistic about the Japanese invading and granting them independence, even if they were satellite states to the Japanese Empire. The quickly learned the unfortunate lesson that the Chinese and Koreans had learned in prior decades.
[deleted] t1_j7mmtcl wrote
[removed]
ErrolFuckingFlynn t1_j7mkecr wrote
I'm very curious as to your reasoning on this. Being shitshow bastards to the Chinese was a pretty integral part of the reasoning behind invading China in the first place.
SirJudasIscariot t1_j7ml7jp wrote
I highly doubt the Chinese would’ve willingly rolled over and accepted Japanese occupation. The Western colonial powers had been repeatedly humiliating them for a century, the British especially, pushing drugs on them so the British could sustain their local and national economy. The two Opium Wars were fought for this reason. And then Japan and China fight for Korea, which had always been in the Chinese sphere of influence, and when Japan won, the other nations began raping their country even more. The last Emperor lost his reign, a new leader became a tyrannical despot, warlords ruled the country and did their own thing, Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong had their political and military battles, and most of Eastern China was a war-torn or corrupt mess. The Japanese just stepped in and played whoever would let them have their territorial conquests. Would the Chinese accept Japanese rule? Only at gunpoint, and only because the Japanese were strong enough and terrible enough to enforce it. Most of the Japanese war crimes were committed in this country because they adopted Western ideas of racism and applied it to the Chinese. It’s a complicated situation, and those Chinese that bowed to Japan did so for power, wealth, security, or because they had no choice, and Japan brutally oppressed them anyways.
Alexexy t1_j7muzly wrote
Japan could have assumed the centuries old imperial China bureaucratic structures, cut deals with warlords/the republic, and as long as they left the peasantry alone or at least let them do whatever they want i doubt they would have a mass uprising. It's not like the republic of China was a very popular political force among the peasantry either.
Aanar t1_j7mlub3 wrote
Good point. Japan already had Manchuria set up as a puppet for themselves in 1936.
China got a lot of arms sent to them. If Japan hadn't been so ruthless, they probably would haven't been sent so many.
Masterzjg t1_j7mq6gq wrote
You can't separate Japanese culture and society from the way they treated conquered peoples.
Kaiser8414 t1_j7mlwmt wrote
Just because Poland keeps getting conquered doesn't mean they were rolling out the red carpet for Germany and Russia in 1939.
Alexexy t1_j7mue1c wrote
Of course most people weren't gonna be ok with it, but the Japanese can probably assume the old diplomatic structures and most normal people would have been ok with whatever is going on unless affects their day to day lives.
But nope, they gotta rape women and bayonet babies.
Vilrek t1_j7mujro wrote
I think the unspoken point was that China's history of being conquered was like, eventually they eclipse their conqueror/assimilate them anyway, such as the Mongols or Manchurians, though I don't think that would happen here, as those two were intent on incorporating China as a whole, while the Japanese mostly just wanted the resources/manpower, like India was to the UK, except a "bit" harsher
treetown1 t1_j7mpbi7 wrote
Often times people forget this - but ironically computer wargames like Strategic Command World at War shows the massive comittment of troops and material to China and how it dwarfed the IJA committment elsewhere.
[deleted] t1_j7mqmf7 wrote
[removed]
TyroneLeinster t1_j7mt7q8 wrote
I think at best it would have sped up Russia’s capitulation had the Germans been more successful and pushed Stalin past the urals as he had anticipated. But given that the Wehrmacht stalled where it did, I don’t think a Japanese eastern front would have moved that needle significantly
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments