Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lingenfr t1_je586b7 wrote

A couple that stand our for me:

April 1865 - The authors thesis is that one month represented a "fold" in history. A focused take on the events rather than a general history. I had read many books on the U.S. Civil War and related persons, but this offered new insights that I had not considered previously.

Partners in Command: George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower in War and Peace - From a historical perspective, it is really interesting and places some world events in context. Great histories of both men and their relationship. For senior military officers, I expect you may agree with me that the author got it wrong by describing Marshall as Eisenhower's "commander". Eisenhower eclipsed Marshall, but respected him as a mentor and friend and valued his input. It highlighted the amazing impact that Marshall had on the Army and the Department of Defense. Despite what I considered a significant shortcoming of the book, I think the rest redeems the book and makes it a worthwhile read.

4

No-Strength-6805 t1_je8667k wrote

I respect your opinion on the book ,but disagree with speaking for other senior military officers ,they may entirely agree with you or only partially agree,or even may agree with the author.But that depends on each officers personal experiences not all are the same,I say this with great respect.

1

lingenfr t1_je8cfke wrote

Hence the "may". My point was that my issue with the book may not resonate with many people, and maybe only senior officers. I don't speak for anyone but myself. Take my opinion for what it is worth or ignore if. No worries

1

No-Strength-6805 t1_je8g58e wrote

Sorry I'm a little over sensitive in belief over years Marshall has started to get overlooked by more and more students of the war.

1