Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

justforthearticles20 t1_isb08t6 wrote

The linked article incorrectly says 900,000 year old human tracks were found "Nearby".

12

Ok-Rice-5377 t1_isb1icy wrote

You are correct, sorry about that! The 900,000 year old track's article uses the word Human also a few times, but then clarifies and says Homo Antecessor; which is in fact an ancestor to Humans, but are not Homo Sapiens themselves.

13