Submitted by marketrent t3_z3sqzu in history
techcaleb t1_ixnuv47 wrote
Not going to lie, on first read I thought they were snacking on bones.
Mega-Steve t1_ixny78h wrote
The archeologists were. That's why most of them get into the business: they get off on eating bones that are hundreds to thousands of years old
asstrologyinthebuff t1_ixnywai wrote
We don’t consume them, we just lick them. 🤷🏻♀️
andrew_1515 t1_ixnyz9i wrote
You just can't beat that dusty crunch of 1000 year old bones
[deleted] t1_ixo5gs1 wrote
[removed]
BuddhistNudist987 t1_ixogz4u wrote
The snack that smiles back - pork bones!
NightflowerFade t1_ixovtrn wrote
It wouldn't have been completely implausible either I guess. Maybe one could roast bones to a crispy texture and eat it as a crunchy snack
[deleted] t1_ixnzgya wrote
[removed]
ElectricInstinct t1_ixo4xx0 wrote
Yeah. Most people read the headline first.
VoraciousGhost t1_ixokyn1 wrote
Do you also read articles before reading their headlines? This headline gives that impression regardless of where you read it.
The headline is poorly phrased, there's no need to bring your unrelated disdain for reddit into it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments