Submitted by AutoModerator t3_z5703a in history
Elmcroft1096 t1_ixwgwbd wrote
Reply to comment by feickus in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Since the formation of this nation the United States Marine Corps has had a few people throughout the history of the United States who have tried to either disband them completely or roll them and their mission into the Army. George Washington didn't want any standing fighting force after the Revolution and we can debate as to why, personally I think he saw a standing military as a threat that potentially could overthrow him. To that end he did disband the Navy, sent sailors home, transferred the officers and ships to the Army. Then he was trying to disband the Army when he was convinced that shrinking it and keeping its mission limited was a better idea which he agreed and did and also tried to disband the Marines. The Marines saved themselves by becoming the military force specifically tasked with protecting the Nation's Capital in so much that they also had to police the streets and assist fire brigades if a fire broke out, all in the name of protecting the Capital.
elmonoenano t1_ixwo3a3 wrote
>George Washington didn't want any standing fighting force after the Revolution and we can debate as to why, personally I think he saw a standing military as a threat that potentially could overthrow him.
This isn't remotely true. Washington's anger at militia forces is well documented. He hated their lack of discipline, saw them as little better than a mob, and was disgusted with their cowardice.
It's not hard to find sources for this.
George Washington was not a big writer, and still managed to turn out this long letter, probably one of his longest, just about problems with militia forces. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-06-02-0305
KurwaStronk32 t1_ixxwg6t wrote
Washington didn’t do any of that, the Continental Congress did.
[deleted] t1_ixz8pbb wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments