Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

girnigoe t1_iyw7me0 wrote

yeah, I thought the picture was ridiculous, why show her as an old person rather than in the prime of her life? But I guess (after reading the article) that that’s what skeletal info they had.

7

teatiller t1_iyxbgso wrote

She’s supposed to be 65 and she looks 85.Maybe people lied about their age back then too

4

Hammer_of_Light t1_iyxhhkh wrote

That's pretty old at a time when life expectancies sometimes didn't hit 40...

1

uqde t1_iyz1zpo wrote

AFAIK this statistic is often misrepresented; the average life expectancy was lower, but largely due to infant and child mortality. Once you made it past 12 or so, you could reasonably expect to live a similar length of time as people in the modern era.

However, your point is still valid in a way. Life back then was physically harder and the state of healthcare was obviously nowhere near what it is now. People likely showed their age much more quickly than people today.

7