Submitted by That-Situation-4262 t3_zm6o59 in history
Comments
WhoRoger t1_j0b5pe4 wrote
Non-amps:
Canonical link: https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/world/article269970832.html
Miamiherald canonical: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/article269970832.html
gdo01 t1_j0bmi45 wrote
As a Miami resident, don’t post Miami Herald links unless you warn people to use the same workarounds you need to use when you open a New York Times article (for example, reader mode in safari)
WhoRoger t1_j0bnbgp wrote
I only pasted what AmputatorBot showed me. Both links work for me fine, I know nothing about Miami or MH, but I know amp links are cancer.
Roundaboutsix t1_j0bvwcy wrote
How does reader mode in Safari work?
l3rN t1_j0d69tr wrote
In iOS you click the little "Aa" next to the address bar and it's one of the options in the drop down menu. Idk how it works on Mac but I'd be surprised if it's not something similar
RandomGrasspass t1_j0ckalj wrote
The Snake glyph looks more like a sperm cell.
Maybe they had microscopes…. Maybe ancient aliens showed them reproductive methods…. /s
BeakersDream t1_j0de225 wrote
Does /s mean sarcasm?
arduheltgalen t1_j0dl35o wrote
No, they are part of the (s)ecret ancient alien(s) or "/s" society. /s
BeakersDream t1_j0dlglv wrote
Ahh so someone who ignores a plethora of evidence, just so they can play make believe. Gotcha
Kiwihara t1_j0dqv21 wrote
....../s?
huhwhuh t1_j0dsnq2 wrote
No it means sperm. That's what he is talking about.
Dreshna t1_j0bm4bs wrote
First link didn't work for me. Second was paywalled.
WhoRoger t1_j0bn16n wrote
Weird, both work for me (mobile Firefox and Bromite). Try reader mode in the browser. For paywalls I'd normally recommend https://12ft.io but it doesn't work here.
Lokkeduen90 t1_j0b59xd wrote
Google amp is destroying the internet u/AmputatorBot
Lokkeduen90 t1_j0b5gzw wrote
I wonder why AmputatorBot is banned on r/history!?
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.
Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/world/article269970832.html | Miamiherald canonical: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/article269970832.html
^(I'm a human | Generated with AmputatorBot | )^(Why & About)^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)
[deleted] t1_j0awwj1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0b53vy wrote
[removed]
ThatGIRLkimT t1_j0ark0f wrote
Cool! Thank you.
[deleted] t1_j0bmb9x wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0dated wrote
[removed]
Naprisun t1_j0a74u2 wrote
They couldn’t give us a few pictures?
youdubdub t1_j0c2qzi wrote
Sadly, there were no arms on any of them.
[deleted] t1_j0dcexi wrote
[deleted]
lopedopenope t1_j0dknlr wrote
Step-brother?
Pshakerc t1_j0dhcui wrote
Seems like you’re asking for a lot……. :-)
themastersmb t1_j0bd39b wrote
This will inspire 168 new ancient Pokemon.
immabettaboithanu t1_j0d2q1j wrote
Of which you have to solve puzzles to release before having the chance to catch them
valkyyr399 t1_j0djiy0 wrote
The puzzles will of course require you to learn braille.
1320Fastback t1_j0cc206 wrote
eli5 how these were not seen by airplanes, satellite or other ways until now?
Babushka77 t1_j0ch6o6 wrote
World big. Image small.
uhhhhhhhyeah t1_j0dq30f wrote
Some are “faded” and damaged, some are in places they weren’t expecting, like sides of hills instead of desert floor. If you get PBS, Nova has a recent special out about it. The science involved in finding them is really cool.
A1CST t1_j0ca8jt wrote
168... we have GPS, satellite imaging now and for the past 20+ years and your telling me they JUST found them. Were they even looking? These things are huge!
Penkala89 t1_j0cbhd5 wrote
Though there are some famously large geoglyphs, most of the ones in this article were relatively small (10-20ft across).
And the desert is also just ... Huge. As a challenge/demonstration, go to Google Earth/Google Maps, go to the first location that pops up for the Nazca Lines and see how long it takes you to find them/how many you can find.
immabettaboithanu t1_j0d356j wrote
These also look harder to discover because the images need lines to show what they look like since they’re likely worn down from being over 2000 years old.
TonyTheTerrible t1_j0e75vu wrote
alright, open google earth and go to their gps. reply with the link once you find them.
[deleted] t1_j0fjj49 wrote
[removed]
mancow66 t1_j0ccyv3 wrote
If you didn’t read the article one of them is definitely the Simpsons, which would indicate that the ancient Peruvians did indeed predicted the Simpsons.
[deleted] t1_j0d2agv wrote
[removed]
johnn48 t1_j0c1ssm wrote
Between Paywalls and Google Amp it’s frustrating to see an intriguing article and be unable to read or post. We have to assume the headlines are accurate and not misleading.
[deleted] t1_j0awnc3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j09qg0q wrote
[removed]
LetMeInStacy t1_j0c0mhh wrote
Future civilization looking at graffiti...."interesting".
parkalever t1_j0cbejn wrote
Graffiti is by far my favorite aspect of archaeology! It’s one of the few things that offers a glimpse into the lives of the average person rather than politicians or military figures.
Kody_Z t1_j0czebi wrote
The "human and abstract swirl" looks like a thought bubble
Ancients drew comics, confirmed?
lostsailorlivefree t1_j0d2yxb wrote
I kinda “got” something, after being mystified for years on the giant Nazca pictoglyphs. After learning there were small ones, 12’ easily viewed just standing there, someone said “our gods might like this, we’re pretty stoked, they might be too!”. So they basically enlarged a few just by imagining and… there ya go. The big mystery being “why so big and only viewable by air”. Well, they just made small into big.
Glendel66 t1_j0doi5g wrote
So, I was glancing at the titles and I had to double take as I was skipping by this one because I read it to say "Found 168 More Action Figures Etched ......"
Johnny_Leon t1_j0dv1wq wrote
I’m actually surprised this stuff is still being found, you’d think with planes and helicopters, it would’ve been seen already.
[deleted] t1_j0ac9e9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0ahxc6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0am3uw wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0arl5u wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0aw7bc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0blnrm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0bnzd1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0cbbbd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0cmkoj wrote
[removed]
L938 t1_j0dsyy7 wrote
why did I immediately think of Poptropica
thinkB4WeSpeak t1_j0k5mkw wrote
Probably even more if erosion and mother nature hadn't go to them.
Buffalo_wander t1_j0tcish wrote
But they didn’t need to create any of those if they couldn’t see above their own heads?
[deleted] t1_j0u8grx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j107lgb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0btg8n wrote
[deleted]
DrDankDankDank t1_j0bu7zv wrote
That one looks to me like a depiction of someone whose head got cut off.
[deleted] t1_j0buy2p wrote
[deleted]
Rekmor t1_j0dcqwo wrote
How long until Greenpeace goes and screws them up.
[deleted] t1_j0dqtqg wrote
[removed]
Lebrons_fake_breasts t1_j0bkajn wrote
I'm just left wondering: did a vehicle come from somewhere out there just to land in the Andes? Was it round? Did it have a motor, or something different?
[deleted] t1_j0bxn7a wrote
[removed]
vinetwiner t1_j0c7mcm wrote
That picture is comically bad. Were 3 year olds their geoglyph designers?
VevroiMortek t1_j0db2qh wrote
Let's see you do better
vinetwiner t1_j0diw68 wrote
No sense of humor here I see. I'll address things more seriously next time.
[deleted] t1_j0a9mdj wrote
[removed]
stunna006 t1_j0abft1 wrote
geoglyphs, that were etched into the soil by the Indigenous peoples who lived in this area between 2,500 and 1,500 years ago.
Seems like that would mean they couldn't be more recent than 1500 years ago
[deleted] t1_j0bgf14 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0byc9t wrote
[removed]
TheDieselTastesFire t1_j0c1w2f wrote
Only fanatics and idiots still think the world is only 10k years old. The Vatican recognized the mechanisms of evolution in 1956.
greennitit t1_j0c56ja wrote
You think Vatican has a say in funding of archeological pursuits by major educational institutions of the world?
Downwhen t1_j0c009b wrote
Huh?
twistedspin t1_j0cenk1 wrote
I would love to know where you're from/where that comment came from because it's just so out there.
[deleted] t1_j0ch3re wrote
[removed]
MarbyRedChainSmoker t1_j0cbc18 wrote
This drawing is incredibly racist. Did they have contact with Africa, cuz it looks like a really racist drawing of an African.
Varaug t1_j0ciy4u wrote
Maybe they were just drawing how they saw themselves.
Maybe you're the racist.
Kody_Z t1_j0czsis wrote
I hope you're being sarcastic.
Otherwise if the first thing you see when you look at a goofy, ancient picture of a human drawn in the dirt is "wow that looks like a racist drawing of an African". . . That means You are the racist, my friend.
Same with people who see orcs in various fantasy settings and think "orcs are like black people".
veryfancycoffee t1_j0ab5sd wrote
Scientists find 200 images that are super interesting! Proceeds to show one.