Submitted by Top_Moment4144 t3_zyhkq3 in history
Nodeo-Franvier t1_j274ynv wrote
Reply to comment by varain1 in Did Italy made a mistake by joining the Entente in 1915 during World War One? by Top_Moment4144
I think the Austrian were justified against Serbian terrorist state though,It's like US response to 9/11. Although in hindsight this was stupid thing to do.
varain1 t1_j27orxr wrote
Unlike USA, Austro-Hungary was a multinational empire, with a lot of internal issues and national liberation movements. Austria broke the Berlin treaty and fully annexed Bosnia, where the majority was not Austrian or Hungarian, but Serbian and Ottoman.
The Austrian heir was killed in Sarajevo, with the killers all being Austrian citizens, the capital of Bosnia, not in Viena.
And Austria, after getting the support of Germany, sent a 48 hours ultimatum to Serbia which would have practically made Serbia a territory of Austria - see bellow some "fun" requests:
-
Remove from the Serbian military and civil administration all officers and functionaries whose names the Austro-Hungarian Government will provide.
-
Accept in Serbia "representatives of the Austro-Hungarian Government" for the "suppression of subversive movements".
Serbia, which had the Russian support, didn't accept the requests, England offered to mediate, but Austro-Hungary decided to declare war on Serbia - Russia started to mobilize, Germany declared war on Belgium, France and Russia, and England declared war on Germany ...
You can read all the fun in Wikipedia, here, but Austro-Hungary really was not like USA, but more like Russia's invasion in Ukraine...
Seienchin88 t1_j289kpo wrote
While I agree the parallels to 9/11 are quite striking. The assassins were citizens of the Austrian empire but they were radicalized and support by a Serbian institution and coordination with he assassination with the knowledge of some Serbian members of government.
varain1 t1_j298vvo wrote
9/11 was an attack in one of the most iconic USA cities on civilians, by foreign citizens. The Sarajevo incident was a targeted assassination on the heir of the empire, done in an occupied province, by Austrian citizens of Serbian nationality - it's a risk you get when you have a multinational empire which has a heavy boot on the occupied nationalities in "Europe 's Powder Keg".
The only parallel is that both are terrorist attacks, but you can list some of the "striking parallels" if you want, I would like to see them ...
PrimevalDuck t1_j29p3dw wrote
> annexed Bosnia, where the majority was not Austrian or Hungarian, but Serbian and Ottoman
Wrong, the majority was Bosniak
varain1 t1_j29zyo6 wrote
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina
I'm not from that area, so I got my numbers from the "1895 census" section, which mentions:
"The Catholic Encyclopedia treated the majority Slavic population (98%) as Serbs".
The census is also listing the numbers by religion, with around 43% Christian Orthodox, 37% Muslim and 20% Catholics ...
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments