Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

suu-solan OP t1_j9ugwpc wrote

Saw this clown while driving near the Holland Tunnel. Probably some sovereign citizen dipshit. Who knows what laws they choose to obey or not according to the constitution in their minds….do they even get pulled over?

40

DirectorBeneficial48 t1_j9uhqjg wrote

Some sovereign citizen asshole. You could probably just steal their car, they won't call the cops

125

ashlandbus t1_j9uisn6 wrote

Was he/she wearing a tin foil hat?

10

CitizenDolan t1_j9uoqkv wrote

Never understood this, their gripe is against the federal government yet driving/motor vehicles is something maintained by the states.

13

PoopFartPatrol t1_j9uqzrl wrote

Can someone elaborate on what this is and what it means instead of just crying about the guy lol

3

imaluckyduckie t1_j9usr31 wrote

Why do you need to obscure an incoherent plate with a cover like that?

27

suu-solan OP t1_j9ut1qc wrote

Well, instead of having a state-issued license plate identifying the car's owner, this person saw fit to mount this fake plate making it impossible to track them down in case of an accident or crime. Also, since this "New York" (maybe? who knows?) car was near the tunnel, I doubt its owner paid the toll if they traveled through it. Should be very illegal on several levels.

Also, if you were to be involved in an accident with this person, do you think they have insurance? Or any intention of even stopping to deal with it?

14

suu-solan OP t1_j9utvdb wrote

If I had to guess, since the police already ignore those tinted plate covers (which triggers another whole rant from me...) probably to hide it from any officers who might care to question this wildly illegal plate. Not saying it makes sense....

35

jakkyskum t1_j9v0lok wrote

r/amibeingdetained has some great videos of these morons

13

A_Downboat_Is_A_Sub t1_j9v18nz wrote

Stupid Life Pro Tip: If you see one of these people, make sure to get in to an accident with them. That way you can have the police come and ticket and tow them for not having registration, plates, or insurance. Then sue them so you get additional entertainment when you go to court.

41

naglephoto t1_j9v2dsw wrote

Sovereign Citizen. They try to claim that the laws don’t apply to them. Something about that they didn’t personally specifically allow each and every one of them.

5

HerrDoktorHugo t1_j9v70xw wrote

It's a flavor of conspiracy weirdo who claim they can just declare themselves exempt from state and federal law, often based on some misreading of old treaties where they claim the United States is actually a corporation and they choose not to be a customer or something.

18

nycnola t1_j9v8s18 wrote

A sovereign citizen in the wild!

7

ffejie t1_j9vctob wrote

You're assuming this person isn't the police, which is the first way this fails. The second way is that they're likely to be the kind of person with a gun and willing to threaten you for looking at them the wrong way, let alone getting into a fender bender. Oops, I already said they're the police.

24

Ezl t1_j9vh9pr wrote

They’re driving on roads funded and maintained by the government using fuel whose import is enabled by the government and undoubtedly living and surviving due a plethora of services and regulations provided by the government.

None of their position makes any sense at all. It’s idiocy.

9

AgreeablePie t1_j9vjm74 wrote

People respond to seeing things that are out of place. A cop seeing that plate is likely to do s double take and, so, it attracts police attention

Having a tinted cover ALSO attracts police attention but it's a lot more common and a lesser violation so it's more likely to be overlooked

4

Zulumus t1_j9vmbif wrote

I remember seeing a video of a guy crossing state lines refusing to be stopped and searched (he had to declare plants or something in his car), and he gave the state worker so much shit.

The video ends when he’s eventually pulled over by state troopers who he argues with before he’s dragged out of the car in front of his two teenage children.

4

jerseycityfrankie t1_j9vot5j wrote

There’s plenty of hilarious yet still painful to watch videos of sov cits trying to argue in and around courts of law. They always look like they know they’re wrong but trying to make it work anyway-it’s the weirdest kind of wrong energy and bad acting.

1

Weak_Criticism6217 t1_j9vqn9f wrote

So does this make you untouchable? Well ya'll know what I mean....and if so...how do I get one (asking for a friend)👀🤣

2

Taalahan t1_j9vs10z wrote

I'm such a moron! Silly me decided to spend 7 years and an assload of money getting a juris doctorate and passing a bar to be a lawyer. I should have just paid $250 to the American Justice Foundation for my honorary law degree at www.howtowinincourt.com! What was i thinking!? I could have learned how to control lawyers and judges in "any case and in any court!

(I found this as a link in the website you linked about the plates. Ugh. These people...)

4

Jimmy_kong253 t1_j9vtghs wrote

It's probably someone who starts every conversation with do you know who my relatives are?

1

So-Many-Shrimp t1_j9vu5r3 wrote

You can siphon gas from this vehicle without legal repercussions...

...but you may get hit with a 3D printed Howitzer shell.

1

Howto_be_normal t1_j9vyjvs wrote

That looks like secret service vehicle. I think that's the presidential seal on the license plate

−3

Vertigo963 t1_j9w1y7d wrote

There are a lot of possible responses, like urging humility and greater respect for others or pointing out we have no idea if the driver is borrowing a relative's car, but I would say the one I feel most strongly about is that when a person is criticizing or considering a political group as a whole, there is a moral obligation to address the group's views in toto rather than dismissing them for particular positions that may be wrong or weak. So, the sovereign citizen movement, while admittedly based in part on various types of bullshit, is also based in part on notions that are harder to dismiss, like the view that the U.S. federal government is dominated by corrupt elitists who have lost any sense of obligation to the citizenry. So I wouldn't dismiss them entirely, again, even though some of their views are bullshit.

0

k0unitX t1_j9wdci1 wrote

Do you know who also agreed with "Sometimes peoples’ beliefs are easy to misguide because they’re assholes"?

The guys who wanted to carpet bomb all of the middle east after 9/11.

Literal Nazis justifying killing the Jewish.

But sure, continue to think you're on the right side of history on this one. lmao

−1

coladict t1_j9xey9r wrote

"Nazis bad, therefore they believed this exact thing I'm against!"

The nazis believe in a natural hierarchy and that violating it in any way must be forbidden. No women above men, no gender non-conformity, no race being above their own, and of course they needed a scapegoat for all the evils of the world, and they chose the jews, because it's easy to co-opt the existing conspiracies about them and make up more.

None of that comes remotely close to:

> Sometimes peoples’ beliefs are easy to misguide because they’re assholes

1

Farkenoathm8-E t1_j9xxlw1 wrote

Sov-Cit: “Hello police, I’d like to report my private property that I use as a conveyance has been stolen.”

Cop: “You mean your car?”

Sov-Cit: “I mean my automobile that I use for travelling. It’s not a car because it’s not for commercial use.”

Cop: “Ok… what’s the make and model?”

Sov-Cit: “It’s a blue Ford Ranger, 2019 model.”

Cop: “They are common as. What’s the registration number so we can identify it?”

Sov-Cit: “…..”

1

New_Examination_5605 t1_j9y0nwt wrote

They are driving an unregistered car around a busy area. That makes them an irresponsible whole. Then they’re trying to pass that off with the stupidest pseudo intellectual bullshit. Even if it’s someone just borrowing that car, they’re still driving an unmarked vehicle around, which is a crime. Are you defending the criminal who is putting everyone else at risk for no good reason?

1

yes4me2 t1_j9y8gsl wrote

I have finally figure out.

When the country was in better state, and people had good job, people worked and everyone was happy. With the rampant crime in the USA, and the increase in cost of living, people are looking for hacks to cheat the system. Some of these folks are sovereign citizen who are trying to come up with ways not to pay for small things like car insurance and hope to not be noticed by the government. And when they get caught, they have this long list of excuses why they are misinformed. In order to reduce this crap, the USA needs to fix the country as a whole. We need better education to reduce idiot republicans talking again about secession and getting reelected. We need gun controls to reduce crime. We need to increase the minimum wage. And then everyone would be happier and smarter... and nobody will believe this nonsense of sovereign citizen, myth on vaccine, etc... we need to be smarter like before 2000.

1

Mishung t1_j9yfwvt wrote

Man I hope the "Z" shit is not what I think it is.

1

gazzilionear t1_j9ynqxv wrote

I’m pretty sure the law they point to is in the articles of confederation..which obviously have no bearing on anything anymore since the confederation no longer exists. Real stupid shit.

2

Vertigo963 t1_j9z0hi7 wrote

I agree that it's not good for some cars not to have license plates, but I don't view that as a moral imperative. No one is committing murder here.

Also, I have to note that illegal immigration leads to widespread violations of vehicle and traffic laws - are you equally enraged at those violations? My guess is most of the people piling on in this thread think those violations are unworthy of prosecution.

1

Vertigo963 t1_j9ziake wrote

I think it's a perfectly reasonable comparison, but happy to be convinced otherwise if you think there's an important distinction here. (I'm politely overlooking your unfounded accusation that I'm arguing in bad faith.)

To repeat, I think this thread is filled with hypocrites who believe that a "sovereign citizen" violating vehicle and traffic laws is worthy of condemnation because they've been told to think of of those people as right-wing and contemptible, but the (more common) case of an illegal immigrant violating vehicle and traffic laws is exempt from condemnation because illegal immigration isn't supposed to be criticized.

1

DontBeEvil1 t1_ja15ixv wrote

A photo a 🤡 took of the back of a 🚗

1