Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_jeg64jn wrote

You’re not winning this case.

OP admitted they went to an adjacent property, which is (while brief) a parking violation. Wells Fargo is a different lot with a different owner. The fence is there to make it clear (which is why they keep repairing it).

Rules on parking lots are they are for the property and businesses only unless explicitly posted.

That tow is the cost of trying to not park and move your car again.

Tow trucks also love to take photos or video now too, so odds are they’ll have that, and you’ll get a bill for the employee who showed up at small claims time. You agreed when getting the car out to pay all expenses related to legal actions etc.

5

SoundMachineJC t1_jeg8g8z wrote

The signs in the lot have:

Parking is for the convenience of customers while shopping at:

(has drawings of Shop Rite, Pep Boys, Bed Bath Beyond, BJ’s logo’s)

Violators will be towed.

4

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_jegd0j2 wrote

Which is all the same property. Hence redevelopment is of those properties only.

Wells Fargo is on a weird shaped lot that goes back to when that was a rail yard. It was some kind of scrap leftover.

3

SoundMachineJC t1_jegs4l8 wrote

and they have the big official signs mentioned in the nj consumer affairs links below at the entrance by Shop Rite and on the BJ's building at that entrance. The towing company, rates, etc. Looks like it is Kings Towing.

3