Submitted by AlexanderHamiltonJC t3_ydh4gz in jerseycity

Hello r/jerseycity!

I have lived in Jersey City for more than 30 years and am a father of a special needs sixth grader in PS 37. I am asking for your support to continue my quest to improve our school district.  As you know the board passed a budget that is almost a billion dollars last year to the ire of many taxpayers.  For the record I have voted against ANY and ALL tax increases during my 3 years on the school board and was regularly the lone dissenting voice on numerous board matters.   Despite my best efforts I was often outvoted by my peers and I believe the board needs less union endorsed candidates and more candidates that think for themselves, seek greater accountability/transparency and support long term viability of our public schools.   In my view the board needs to work in close partnership with the state, county and city to come up with realistic solutions to resolve the district’s budget problems.  

Please post your questions below.   Looking forward to shed some light on my platform. Thank you very much for the opportunity.

EDIT: Thank you so much for all for your thoughtful questions. This concludes our AMA session for this evening. It's been wonderful to see such strong voter engagement on reddit. For those of you that missed it feel free to ask more questions down below I will do another sweep and try to answer them by tomorrow. You can also email your questions to me at alexanderhamilton@jcboe.org. GOOD NIGHT!

https://preview.redd.it/v5p9qjtoy0w91.jpg?width=1991&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=022454047cd035023c32990d6ddc4e4e414eb536

pre-post: https://www.reddit.com/r/jerseycity/comments/yc0wh2/hello_rjerseycity_im_alexander_hamilton_i/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

37

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its4hui wrote

From u/mymindisgoo Wait didn't you get shot in Weehawken hundreds of years ago?!?!?!

Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated :)

27

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its4xai wrote

from u/kokoromelodyCan you go into any more detail what your plans would be for higher transparency/ accountability, especially when it comes to how the current and potential future budget proposals are allocated? As a property owner, I'm not blindly against any and all tax increases, but it's frustrating to see that JC has one of the highest expenditures per student that don't seem to translate into student performance or the overall school quality.

This is a very important question. One of the things I would like to do is make sure we are following exactly where the money is going in this budget. I, too, am not against all tax increases, as long as they are justified and can show some results.

One of the ways I think that real change can happen in this district is with real transparency and accountability. So how does the district accomplish this? I strongly believe that this administration needs a Budget Officer. Why? Well, think of the administration as a corporation. The Superintendent is the CEO and the Business Administrator serves as the COO and the CFO. In order for a corporation to run effectively, it would NEVER have one person for two massively important positions. Think about it, our administration has the same person making all of the operational decisions as well as the financial decisions. This hierarchy has led to wasteful spending, bad contract negotiations, nepotism and a bloated budget in our district. As I said earlier, I am not against all tax increases but when the administration submits a $970 million dollar budget and does not disclose what they plan on doing with the money, I think that is wrong. Let’s work together with the administration (and Budget Officer) to create a plan, present it to the public, agree on that plan and then ask taxpayers to “buy in”. This is the proper order of how budgeting and planning should work together.

12

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its5b78 wrote

from u/jazzplate I was wondering if you could explain last year's budget (that caused a fairly large property tax increase) and why you voted against it. Some insiders called the budget bloated and unnecessary, but I've also read that it had to be done because state funding is receding. What is actually going on?

In short both of the reasons you are hearing are correct. The state has cut about $235 million dollars in aid since 2018 and we have both a bloated budget and wasteful spending. Please keep in mind that while we were losing state funding, the district was actually increasing the budget every year. In 2020 Jersey City had a school budget of $774 million, in 2021 $827 million and in 2022 the budget is now set for $973 million! That’s a $200 million dollar increase in just 3 years. So yes, Jersey City is receiving less money from the state now to offset these total amounts but that combined with a bloated budget has gotten us to where we are today. I voted no to these increases because I felt it was irresponsible of this district to ask the taxpayers to pay more, first when the pandemic started and now again when we are on the verge of a recession with inflation at an all time high. Too much burden on our residents for what we are getting.

19

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its5w9b wrote

from u/keepseeing444 In Hudson County, Secaucus and Weehawken school districts’ annual school budgets are voted on by its citizens and not by the school board. Do you think JC should follow suit given carte blanche mentality of union backed board members and their unwillingness to work with the city government on implementing spending controls?

​

I think this is a very interesting option to explore and I am open to it. This is especially important if the administration continues to increase the budget year after year and the students' results do not change. It is important for the public to have a say as it is the tax payers money we are spending.

10

EyesOnImprovement t1_its5x9q wrote

You're backed by the Lefrak organizations superPAC FairerNJ.
How do you square your commitment to education while being funded by a company that took Jersey City to court in order to avoid paying the 1% payroll tax that was supposed to cover the loss in state funding?
Do you agree with Fulop that the companies that have not paid the tax should be exempt from interest on their debt, as opposed to homeowners unable to meet these increases?

2

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its60b1 wrote

from u/RebeccaLoneBrook29 How often is the water quality of the schools tested?

The district is in the process of replacing the water supply at several of our schools. This will be an ongoing project that will take a little longer to complete for all of our buildings. When you ask “How often is the water quality of the schools tested” I am assuming you are referring to the schools with the new water systems installed. The other schools that have not been updated do not have potable water and are relying on bottled water. I do not have an exact answer on the testing frequency of the new water systems but I will find out and get back to you.

7

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its640n wrote

from u/mooseLimbsCatLicks Do the members of the school board have any regrets on how long the schools were closed to in person learning? Do you think in hindsight it was incorrectly handled?

This is a very difficult question. As the father of a 6th grader in the district it was very hard to have him home for so long during virtual learning. All in all, I think the district did a pretty good job preparing for virtual learning. While it did have a lasting effect (negative) on students, teachers and parents, I would have liked to see schools reopen a bit sooner than they did. Again, I think the district did the right thing in the beginning with so many unknowns but as we began to get a clearer picture of the pandemic I think we could have had our children back in school sooner. Hindsight is 20/20 though and there were many students, teachers and parents who were afraid to go back too early.

14

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its6a0r wrote

from u/Automatic_Forever_43 It's said that we spend approximately $30,000+ annually on each student in the JC School system. If correct, it strikes me that there's a big disconnect between what we spend and the quality of the education the students receive, despite the efforts of very capable teachers and administrators. Outside of the educational product, the infrastructure within the schools is old, antiquated and in disrepair. When this issue is raised, there's typically a deflection to the standouts, the Blue Ribbon schools, in our JC system. Looking at the school system on the whole, not the outliers, how do we ensure that the revenue brought in to the school system is spent on the in class room experience getting our kids ready for college or trade schools? Where are the funds going today, what's the distribution of capital allocation, and would it be better to have the school budget as part of the city budget, instead of a stand alone? Thanks.

The $30,000+ price tag per student is quite alarming. Even Newark (a district comparable in student enrollment to Jersey City) is spending approx $26,000 per student. I do not fault our very capable teachers for this. The schools themselves are old and much is in disrepair at several locations. This contributes to an environment that is not conducive to learning for our students and poor work conditions for our teachers and staff. I also want to stress that Jersey City has an education equity problem. The schools in Jersey City are far from being equal. The district needs to do a much better job of making sure that ALL children in Jersey City can get the same education. Specifically for the schools in the more impoverished areas of the city. These neighborhoods have suffered through much neglect as far as the attention that these schools receive.

The question that you ask is very relevant and I think the best way to ensure that the money makes its way to our students is to hire a Budget Officer for the administration. It is the only way to guarantee transparency regarding where the $973 million dollars is going. Then we could better see how this budget is helping our students prepare for college and what is being done to help raise our students' scores in Math and Science for example. I don’t, however, believe that the school budget should be mixed in with the city budget. I worry that would actually cause more problems as far as transparency is concerned.

16

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its6g9v wrote

from u/FloatingWeight Virtual learning has set kids back, how are the jersey city schools attempting to tackle this?

The harsh reality of virtual learning was that it had an adverse effect on the education and socialization of our students. I know that the district has worked hard to improve course curriculums to help students accelerate learning and at the same time provide more social workers/programs for the students to talk to and participate in. One of the things I’d like to see is more of an emphasis placed on after school programs. We lost about a year of in-person learning due to COVID. We have to look at where and when we can implement more instructional learning for our students. I think there may be a way that our schools can use the after school time to help.

11

JCasianmob t1_its6uue wrote

Are charter schools bad? Can you tell us why if they are?

3

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its7a4b wrote

from u/jcskunk Parents rave about Jersey City public charter schools their children attend, but have almost never heard the same for regular public schools with a couple of exceptions. What can we do to encourage charter schools and/or make the public schools operate to a similar standard?

While Jersey City public charter schools are funded from the district's budget, they operate independently. I think one of the reasons that you hear great things from parents about charter schools is that they are innately tied closer to the community that they operate in. Since they can micro-manage their students, faculty and staff, it is often easier for charter schools to make quick changes and react faster to concerns. There are other factors to consider though such as higher teacher turnover rates, lower student diversity and the possibility of closure.

I would like to see our district discuss/observe educational systems and methods that may be working in the charter schools and mimic the programs that are successful. For that matter, I am a fan of even going out of district and finding out what is working for students all of the state of NJ. If there is something successful in another district, it does not mean that it can not work here in Jersey City as well.

15

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its7hsj wrote

from u/Downtown-Prompt-6499 You have been serving on the school board for 3 years - what have you done to ensure the Payroll Tax is being collected for the benefit of the Jersey City Public Schools? The SuperPac that is funding your campaign is suing the City over the Payroll Tax. This seems to be a huge conflict of interest. The Payroll Tax would have helped alleviate the tax burden on individual property owners

The Payroll Tax is the law of the land and should be obeyed. The SuperPAC that is funding the Change for Children slate has nothing to do with the fact that the law must be followed. I want to remind everyone that according to the state of New Jersey, it is the city of Jersey City that has to enforce this law and collect the proper funds. The School Board has no role in collecting the actual tax dollars generated by the Payroll Tax. That being said, I have personally sat down with the Mayor and requested that the city do a stronger job to enforce the Payroll Tax to help ensure that the maximum amount is collected for the school district.

9

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its7on3 wrote

from u/aramova LeFrak contributes significant funds to you and your Change cohorts, after getting hundreds of millions in tax abatements which went into their pockets leaving the citizens of Jersey City with the out of control tax situation in our BOE how are we supposed to believe you've got our kid's interests at heart?

Is the Change for Children you stand for just the change that goes into LeFrak's pockets?

Please keep two things in mind regarding this question:
1) The Education Matters slate is funded with far more $$$ by the NJEA Union PAC then Change for Children.
2) I have a special needs child in the 6th grade currently attending public school in our district. Do you really think that I am going to put anything ahead of his or any other childs needs?

Your anger about the tax abatements is justified, however, and they are one of the reasons why we are where we are currently. But I am here to do a job (a non-paying job BTW) because I believe that I can help make a difference. I can not change your opinion of LeFrak, nor do I wish to but if you’ve watched me over the last 3 years while I served on this board you would know that I always spoke/voted my mind and was never influenced by outside forces of any kind. At the end of the day we are all one taxpayer group in Jersey City. If you are a big landlord, a single family owner or a renter, it would still be better for all of us to have better schools in our district that were budgeted properly.
Another point I’d like to bring up is the fact that I am the only non NJEA Union endorsed member on the current school board. If the NJEA Union backed candidates win this election then all 9 seats on this board will be Union endorsed members. Is that really appropriate or fair? Especially when it comes to things like negotiating teacher contracts? And you all know that 2023 is when the current teacher contract expires, right?

17

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its807x wrote

from u/glasssa251 What do you think needs to be done in order to retain and hire quality teachers?

The teacher shortage is a huge nationwide problem and Jersey City is certainly experiencing this issue as well. There are a couple of things we can do as a district to help alleviate this problem:

1) Teachers need to know that they will be valued by our district. Our entry level salary of $61,000 is far less than other competing districts (other districts are also providing signing bonuses) and probably the biggest reason that we lose out on new teacher talent to other districts.

2) The current step system (when teachers get raises) takes far too long for a teachers salary to actually increase to a meaningful amount. This is another reason why teachers leave our district early. It also accounts for a big reason why the union contract with our teachers is very top heavy as far as salaries go.

3) When we renegotiate the teachers contract next year we must even out the pay scale so that teachers can start with a higher salary and receive better raises as they remain in the district. Then we will be able to hire new teachers and retain their talent within our district and there is nothing more important than our teachers.

5

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its83pg wrote

from u/R_At1antis I'm sympathetic to your drive for district accountability, but feel held hostage by the fact that the district's first response to budget shortfalls is to lay off teachers, as they did as recently as 2019. How will you ensure that the budget discipline you propose will not impact my child's Pre-K classroom?

Teacher layoffs are not the first place, as you mentioned, we should be looking at as far as our budget is concerned. We need to find wasteful spending and mismanagement. I do not classify teachers as either.

6

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its8al0 wrote

from u/novelteal Could you be specific about which votes and actions taken by other BoE members and state/local governments you disagree with and you feel are interfering with having better public schools in Jersey City? And as a follow up, if you were hypothetically able to snap your fingers and get the BoE and local governments to change anything you wanted about our current process, what realistic solutions would you implement?

I think this board blindly approved budgets without question during the COVID pandemic and again now when we are entering a recession with high inflation. While the 2022-2023 budget barely passed with a 5-4 vote, I still think it was irresponsible to raise the budget to $973 million after losing so much state aid. I also think that there has not been enough sense of urgency concerning our crumbling infrastructure. As a district we were allowed to use much of the federal COVID dollars to fix several issues with our schools. Yet there is still currently $105 million in federal funds sitting and waiting to be used for such projects. But the answer was raising taxes again? Even with this money sitting dormant? Also, we just received another $89 million dollars from the state. Once the state accepted $2.5 billion in federal COVID relief money, the state agreed to comply with a provision called the Maintenance of Equity. This provision prohibits states from cutting state aid in high-need districts in 2021 and 2022 and barred the state from reducing aid to high-poverty districts below 2019 levels. Again, we knew this money was coming but it was more important to raise taxes on our residents? The total of both of these cash windfalls is $194 million dollars! Enough said.

As far as a snap-of-the-fingers solution I don’t think there is one. I will say that we really need to come up with a long term solution or we will be right back here next year. The state, county, city and the district need to communicate regularly for REAL budgetary solutions and not kick the can down the road. Our kids deserve better and the only way to accomplish this is to work together.

10

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_its8g2b wrote

from u/jcskunk Jersey City Public Schools regularly test poorly on math and science. The scores are consistently substantially worse than on reading. What can we do to improve student performance on critical subjects to prepare students for the jobs of the future?

One of the biggest setbacks for our students are the conditions of our buildings. These are not environments that are conducive to learning. With leaking roofs, old/dirty bathrooms that don’t work, unreliable heat and no air conditioning in many schools, it is amazing that our students can even concentrate on their work at all. If as adults we were asked to work a job in these locations, the condition of the building would likely affect our desire to stay. The same could be said for our teachers; it is not proper for them to work under these conditions either. If the district provided a better learning environment for the students I know it would improve scores. Think about it, how can you excel at a subject like science if you don’t have proper lab space or equipment?

Now I don’t think that is the only thing that can be done but with the current improvements to our curriculum and grades/scores actually starting to improve, I think we also have to give it some time. The pandemic and virtual learning did not help but I do think that we are pointed in the right direction.

6

Downtown-Prompt-6499 t1_its8jn7 wrote

Please confirm the $974M budget has a charter schools pass through of ≈$130M so the district with an actual budget of $844M

2

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_itsbi2f wrote

Most of this was answered in a previous question about LeFrak. But as far as the city not imposing interest on any company that has not paid their debt regarding the Payroll Tax is just wrong. Companies should be held to the same standards that all taxpayers are and pay what they owe in full.

9

SlamaCo t1_itscz2d wrote

What’s your estimate for an ideal 2023 budget? Would it be an overall increase, stay the same, or decrease?

4

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_itse1ml wrote

Confirmed. But please understand that The Jersey City School Board includes the charter schools in its budget and in its number of students. Although the charter schools operate independently they are still 100% funded by the district's budget. There are currently 4,099 students enrolled in Jersey City charter schools and 25,496 students enrolled in our public schools.

9

keepseeing444 t1_itsezxk wrote

I see now why the board half assed the new superintendent search and instead just decided to go with Dr Fernandez, a 40 year lifer in public school system. It’s mind boggling nobody at the board or media or mayor’s office even questions this publicly. So incredibly, deeply corrupt!

12

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_itsfxbf wrote

The healthcare plan that the teachers receive is negotiated by and agreed upon by the Union. While the administration may be in charge of shopping for insurance plans, it is the union that has the final say regarding the health plan selected for their members. When the teacher contract is negotiated in 2023 this issue can be looked at more closely to try and save more money for teachers and the district.

8

glasssa251 t1_itsh44z wrote

That's not what I'm asking. The current pay plan for benefits was negotiated so we could get a cap on payout. My question is do you think it's fair that teachers are paying for Healthcare to begin with since we can't opt out?

−2

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_itshujn wrote

This was one of the worst things that this board did for perhaps the most important decision that a school board makes. We voted to conduct a national search for a superintendent, passed a resolution to conduct one and then they just did not do it. I was so upset with this and the day that Dr. Fernandez was approved, I absolutely went off in public session about it during our board meeting. The board basically lied to the public and did not follow through on a commitment that was made. I was disgusted by this. I personally don’t have anything against Dr. Fernandez, I think she is a good person and we need her to be successful because now she is our superintendent but the board let the district down on this.

21

averageredditor19 t1_itsinjd wrote

Is there any truth to the idea that some of the poor performance of the schools is due to the social situation of the families and communities of the children attending school? if the community is broken, how can the student in school perform well?

5

AlexanderHamiltonJC OP t1_itsljf2 wrote

I would love to give you a definitive answer here but this is one of the big reasons why I want to bring in a Budget Officer for this administration. We first need real answers as to where the money is actually going in this budget before we can make predictions like that. That being said, I do not want to see this budget increase again in 2023 and cause more pain to the taxpayers of Jersey City.

11

keepseeing444 t1_itsnk7s wrote

You’re asking a different question. How much do you pay for monthly health insurance premium exactly? Do you think it’s fair employees in private companies pay in some cases $2000 per month for family health plan? Many employees in public sector also do not have free health insurance. They also do not have summers off. You sound awfully entitled.

8

glasssa251 t1_itsotr9 wrote

Do said private companies offer employees the ability to opt out of their insurance plan? Because jersey city does not. I only pay for myself because my husband (who works for a private company) gets free Healthcare and I cannot opt out of mine to go on his. If I had a family of four on my plan, it would cost me $800 a month.

Also, while I have summers off, I don't get vacation days, which I'm sure many private sector employees have. I also don't get a paid maternity leave unless I pay for short term disability insurance.

If I come off as entitled, it's because I've been teaching for too long to put up with not being treated like a human being by the people I have to answer to.

−6

Automatic_Forever_43 t1_itsxv4r wrote

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I totally agree with you points and think a Budget Officer would make a significant progress into understanding how resources are being allocated. I hope you have the opportunity to propose and implement this idea.

8

AlexanderDaOK t1_ittun7o wrote

What's your stance on duels? I hope better than the last time

2

R_At1antis t1_itu820m wrote

Thanks, I appreciate the response, but this does not quite answer my question as the board does not necessarily decide if the district will choose to conduct layoffs rather than cut wasteful spending to favored contractors or nepotism.

Perhaps a better a way to ask this question: Why were teacher layoffs required in 2019 and were they justified?

Ultimately for those of us with children at PS16, as long as the school levy increases are not higher than private school tuition for two children, it doesn’t seem worth risking seeking economies, no matter how justified they might be. Curious for any feedback you may have.

0

mrcrazy2u t1_itz6lta wrote

Hi Alex, I'm a former JCPS teacher. I left this year after 15 years in JC. Another district offered me a raise and JC didnt want to negotiate or try to retain me.

I personally know 2 other teachers that the same happened.

As long as JCPS continues to allow this to happen the better paying districts will continue to use JCPS as a "minor league" to poach its trained employees.

4

hyphenthis t1_iu1o4z7 wrote

Ok, so you wanted him to say "Yes, I have the interests of children at heart"? I don't agree with you on him deflecting, I consider it as an example of why he has the interests of children at heart. Now I'm curious who you'll vote for, how did they answer this question?

1

OkAbbreviations4982 t1_iu2qeq9 wrote

I wanted him to address Lefrak's influence. Lefrak has been one of, if not the biggest recipient of long term tax abatements. Until very recently the schools were not receiving a penny from the payments that the abated properties paid, that money went directly to the city. The JC schools were then subsidized with state aid. This arrangement came to an end and the city implemented a payroll tax to partially fund the expected shortfall. Lefrak challenged the tax in court 2019 and finally lost this year. I think it's a fair question to challenge a candidate whose main source of funding is the same company's superPAC, also set up in 2019, seemingly in response to the payroll tax. You may feel the answer was sufficient but I do not think having a kid in the system or the other side having more funding negates the obviously benign intentions of Lefrak. I won't be voting for anyone, they are all a shower of shits.

1

hyphenthis t1_iu33baj wrote

So you actually wanted him to answer a totally different question. I'm not saying the question you're asking isn't valid, but it's a very different question.

Your question is: "Can you address Lefrak's influence on Jersey City's budget?"

The question asked was: "How do we know you have the interests of children at heart?"

7

keepseeing444 t1_iu35tbl wrote

not Alex but based on his other answers it sounds like he values and respects teachers. The budget is near a billion dollars and your administration has decided they rather waste it on deadweights, nepotism hires and unscrupulous vendor contracts instead of improving the pay scale of all teachers that actually do the real and tough job of teaching urban kids. As a taxpayer I wish teachers call out their union for this gross mismanagement.

0

mrcrazy2u t1_iu3oyeo wrote

The teachers union has nothing to do with who administration hires.

But for the record you are right about administration with nepotism hires and promotions. However, they're not our union.

4

ah73911 t1_iu40mh2 wrote

Hamilton sounds the most convincing about not raising taxes further and actually creating solutions to budgeting and keeping taxes lower. The current change for education board (neomi velasquez, chris tisdale) sound very vague about how funds are used and are even implying they would be happy to raise taxes further if they needed to!??
EVERYONE PLEASE VOTE THIS NOV 8TH!!

3

mookybelltolls t1_iu6r25o wrote

Band aids are unavoidable in a system that has had no maintenance for 50 years or more. Very old buildings with inadequate wiring, bad roofs, non-working bathrooms and no air conditioning make it so that the BOE has to gerryrig things to cope.

1

mookybelltolls t1_iu6snya wrote

You write that you voted against past tax increases. The State insists on their funding formula. How would you have funded the budget without tax increases?

1