Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ip3p t1_iuthxw1 wrote

They don’t investigate because it’s not their money to lose. Fraudulent charges for online (card not present) transactions end up being covered by the merchant who accepted the card, the banks don’t cover anything in that case.

1

HElGHTS t1_iuu5rj4 wrote

Can merchants use insurance to guard against this, or would that just increase the expected value of their losses even more (in exchange for turning a variable cost into a fixed cost)?

2

ip3p t1_iuutidl wrote

It's mostly used by larger merchants, but there are services that do essentially that. The services analyze the transaction and will approve/deny it based on fraud risk. Denied transaction they won't cover if a 'chargeback' occurs.

The cost is usually a fixed percentage of the transaction, usually ~1% but can be higher and lower depending on the risk level of the industry.

1