Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MrShotgunxl t1_j9fyvub wrote

Reply to comment by B-Roc- in whos at fault if someone antagonize you into a fight and you do it? by darksider54

Yeah I think it’s called the Castle Doctrine. Gives you the right to defend your home - MA does not abide. https://wisevoter.com/state-rankings/castle-doctrine-states/

4

bleepbloopbluupp t1_j9g4s0s wrote

There is Castle Doctrine in MA

0

DRZ36 t1_j9gh0p7 wrote

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, this is correct. Section 8A says:

Section 8A. In the prosecution of a person who is an occupant of a dwelling charged with killing or injuring one who was unlawfully in said dwelling, it shall be a defense that the occupant was in his dwelling at the time of the offense and that he acted in the reasonable belief that the person unlawfully in said dwelling was about to inflict great bodily injury or death upon said occupant or upon another person lawfully in said dwelling, and that said occupant used reasonable means to defend himself or such other person lawfully in said dwelling. There shall be no duty on said occupant to retreat from such person unlawfully in said dwelling.

1

MrShotgunxl t1_j9ghy3x wrote

It’s complex, the key phrase is “about to inflict great bodily injury…”. Also, castle doctrine is not one specific law it is several laws that states use. In a castle doctrine state, you can shoot someone in your house regardless of whether you believe you’re in immediate danger. What you stated may be considered a piece of castle doctrine, but compared to other states it’s much more restrictive here. If you shoot a burglar on sight in Massachusetts, or beat him, and he was unarmed you are in potentially serious trouble if he is injured enough that he can’t walk away. It would be different in a state with true castle doctrine laws.

0