Submitted by Hoosac_Love t3_125h5tz in massachusetts
Comments
[deleted] t1_je98dbl wrote
[deleted]
Hoosac_Love OP t1_je98p83 wrote
I didn't see that in the article but it said he was from New Jersey so perhaps he was renting
kingeddie98 t1_je98tnb wrote
Did the DA’s office discover that the suspect intended to do it?
Hoosac_Love OP t1_je9c04o wrote
The DA must have discovered something,they got the indictment
9Z7EErh9Et0y0Yjt98A4 t1_jeana3j wrote
It's really easy to get a grand jury to indict, it's not an adversarial process.
That said, presumably the DA wouldn't swing for this unless there was something more there.
Hoosac_Love OP t1_jeani9a wrote
Yea ,they won't want the egg on there face better known as an acquittal
9Z7EErh9Et0y0Yjt98A4 t1_jeaoc98 wrote
Most cases end in plea agreements, so it's not exactly uncommon for prosecution to pile up scary indictments to improve their negotiation position. Plead guilty to a reduced charge or risk a billion years at trial, doesn't require a master of game theory to work it out.
Trial by jury is pretty uncommon outside your high school civics textbook.
Hoosac_Love OP t1_jeaptfb wrote
Yea true ,plea scaring is an unethical but common tactic.A prosecutor is not supposed to bring charges unless they truly feel thay can prove a case BRD.
Very often they throw on charges to get a better plea,if they charge here murder 2 they can get a longer sentence out of a manslaughter plea.
It would be ironic if the DA's are using Mac book's instead of Microsoft laptops in court.
[deleted] t1_je4stsr wrote
[deleted]