Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

medforddad t1_je0zctz wrote

> Remind me why it’s “safe” for Police to have Ar’s and Glocks but as soon as a normal person gets one it’s considered a “dangerous “ weapon

Does any person actually hold that view? The type of people who are for more restrictive gun laws on individuals are also the type to not be big fans of the police having more deadly, militaristic weaponry.


yourboibigsmoi808 t1_je3r959 wrote

Yes literally the politicians who draft gun laws with loopholes for LEO’s to get guns that these same politicians are harping off that are a hazard and too dangerous for people to have hence Ma approved gun roasters but they don’t apply for law enforcement. “Laws for thee , but not for me”


medforddad t1_je4mll3 wrote

Which politicians exactly? Can you point to someone in the MA legislature who has advocated for stricter gun laws and has advocated for more police access to deadly weapons?