Submitted by Avocadoexpresss t3_125ww38 in massachusetts
deeply_concerned t1_je7o9bm wrote
Reply to comment by E5D5 in Death with dignity by Avocadoexpresss
Because they’re religious.
George_GeorgeGlass t1_je8c49z wrote
Nope. Atheist nurse here. You couldn’t be more off base with this take
We should allow end of life care. But the reason we don’t isn’t because healthcare providers are religious. Shaking my head
burn_your_bible t1_je8gzo3 wrote
On a large scale it is
MysteryMedic t1_je7pwkr wrote
Nope. For me (paramedic) the procedure was to be handled poorly. There was (and I’m trying to remember, because it’s been a while) no accommodations made for the people who are forced to manage the after. There was no connection to existing end-of-life orders. So when we responded to a residence for a well-being check there was nothing that prevented us from doing our jobs. I 100% support your right to die, but I’m not letting you die peacefully and without intervention just so your pissed off relatives can make my career a living hell.
deeply_concerned t1_je7q4zf wrote
Who cares about the after. If someone is suffering they should have the choice to end it.
MysteryMedic t1_je7ra6u wrote
Ummm. We do. Because we have a legal duty to act. And without protections in the case of death (Massachusetts uses the MOLST form) we now either violate your desire to in peace and dignity or we risk our jobs. So, yeah. Tie up some important lose ends and most of us will be VERY behind this.
George_GeorgeGlass t1_je8cj6t wrote
This
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments