Submitted by tahitidreams t3_xt5w4s in massachusetts
RevengencerAlf t1_iqs28k7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Question 2 by tahitidreams
"That's not how loss ratios work." That's literally my point. It's like you're just using phrases you've heard an adult say in an argument before without understanding their rhetorical function.
Just, because you have a literacy problem doesn't mean I or anyone else here besides you "doesn't understand ratios."
The fact that you aren't even capable of articulating what you think I'm getting wrong but are arguing it anyway just outs you as a barely literate trog trying to sound smarter on the internet than you could ever in your absolute wildest dreams hopw to actually be.
[deleted] t1_iqs2mo0 wrote
[deleted]
zeratul98 t1_iqsb3e5 wrote
84% of $1 is $0.84, leaving $0.16, not $0.26.
>Your low IQ is showing.
The irony
>There is no reason to support this unless you are a dentist who wants to raise their rates.
FYI, overly broad statements like this make your whole argument suspect because they show you can't be trusted to be honest and/or think
RevengencerAlf t1_iqs2xem wrote
Oh that's cute it thinks it figured out how to read and do math.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments