Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

stuartroelke OP t1_iryqnsd wrote

Reply to comment by Kissfan07 in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke

It’s not “sitting around,” eating lunch is a basic right. I know you COULD fast for eight or more hours, but that’s also not a reason to comply with anything. And as I said before, it’s not free time, and you can’t spend it how you choose. You are bound to the location you work. It’s not the same as having time at the beginning or end of a shift.

−3

XtremeWRATH360 t1_is0b5a5 wrote

Your point you keep losing people on is this whole “it’s not free time you can’t spend it how you choose” makes zero sense. On a lunch you can go eat food, go to the bank, go get your car washed, go get your taxes done, spend some time with a significant other, take a walk and on and on. You have to have a better argument because again you’re making it seem like you’re held hostage and have to get permission from your employer to do anything while you’re out on lunch. And let’s say you magically get paid for lunch. How will getting paid allow you to get things done during the same time span that you magically can’t get done currently? None of this makes sense.

3

Kissfan07 t1_iryrjys wrote

You’re hopeless. Start your own business and do what you want. There is absolutely no pleasing people like you.

1

stuartroelke OP t1_iryyg9i wrote

Pleasing people like me? That phrase is meaningless. I’m asking for advice on how to advocate for labor regulations that I believe in, and you’re calling me hopeless. What do you want me to say? It’s hypocritical.

−1

Kissfan07 t1_is0o9sl wrote

Your arguments are bull shit. You’re telling me the hour isn’t free time. It is. Just because you can’t catch a movie, or mow your lawn in that hour, doesn’t mean it’s worthless. I do t eat lunch, so I sit around. You eat, so you expect to be paid because somehow that’s a “right”.

1

Ialnyien t1_irzawrv wrote

Eating lunch is not a basic right. You have a good thought but I would highly recommend you steer away from the hyperbole.

If you are prevented from leaving the premise of your employer, I would think they’d have to pay you for that. That was always a stipulation is that if they require you to be present during your lunch, it should be paid.

1