Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ajuice01 t1_iturwn0 wrote

Wasn’t it proven that Hillary had people fabricate that evidence?

−1

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_ituuyp2 wrote

If you're referring to Durham, everything he's put forth has been repeatedly shown to be bullshit.

2

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_ituu2zj wrote

If this is the case, it's news to me. Please cite a credible source for this.

1

ajuice01 t1_itv8268 wrote

What about your credible source for proven Russian interference?

−1

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_itvckgp wrote

LMFAO. Another MAGAt/conservative/liberatarian/CT/trump apologist fanboi.

Anyone: States a widely accepted truth and fact

You: States wild contradiction to said fact.

Anyone: Prove your contradiction.

You: No, you prove your already proven and widely accepted fact.

But I'll play along. Here's 5 sources for you. Now pony up.

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-senate-findings-fact/factbox-key-findings-from-senate-inquiry-into-russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-election-idUSKCN25E2OY

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more

https://apnews.com/article/d094918c0421b872eac7dc4b16e613c7

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

3