Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

nrvs_hbt OP t1_ivpkcas wrote

As shown in this screenshot, Great Barrington is the only town so far to vote majority No on 2, and it was by a huge margin.

Why is this? Does the CEO of Delta Dental live there or something?

21

iTZBLaSToFFTiMe t1_ivpl3ab wrote

In Olde English, “Barrington” means “Town of Dentists”

127

[deleted] t1_ivppzqm wrote

Because the government putting their dirty sticky hands in anything is a bad fucking idea and leads to extra cost through taxation and administration which translates to more cost for you for less. Terrible fucking idea.

−50

neutron_uplink t1_ivpr38r wrote

You can certainly move into the woods of Alaska if big bad govt is so awful. But you wouldn't because you know damn well you need the government. So chill out with the bluster

12

[deleted] t1_ivps01b wrote

False. No one needs government, people just like government because it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy that someone is supposed to be looking out for you - they’re not.

−23

Quincyperson t1_ivps1mv wrote

Because they don’t have teeth anyways

18

[deleted] t1_ivpse7u wrote

What’s different now? They inject toxic chemicals into your food, the environment and your body and tell you it’s for your health and it’s not toxic and you just eat that up, literally, just wondering why are dying from cancer after following all the governments advice…. Camp Lejeune is the current headline but let’s not forget about all the food additives the FDA says are great and turn out to be horrible…. So weird….you simpleton

−43

Relative_Professor48 t1_ivpt18h wrote

Great Barrington is one of the towns in the Berkshires that are full of rich old people so makes sense they voted this way

2

neutron_uplink t1_ivptvht wrote

Yes. You. Do. Right now you're using a device that wouldn't exist without federal govt R&D, using electricity regulated by the government (unless you have your own power generation, transmission and storage), the internet (also thanks to govt R&D). And eating food you would have no possibility of obtaining without the government.

What makes you so special that the government needs to "look out for you" in particular? This is a society my friend. You live in it. The government does it's best to provide for all. You are certainly free to unplug and go into the wild, but again, you won't.

15

wkomorow t1_ivpuj09 wrote

The only thing I can think of is the American Institute of Economic Research is located there. It is a libertarian thinktank. Maybe they canvased the area with placards, etc. The area itself is very blue so it should have gone the way of the rest of the Berkshires, so that really is an oddity.

57

nrvs_hbt OP t1_ivpvb4j wrote

Thank you for providing an actual answer! You could be right, although it's such an anomaly that at this point I'm more likely to believe the Globe made a mistake in reporting.

23

TecumsehSherman t1_ivpwrcn wrote

>Camp Lejeune is the current headline

This is the right wing conspiracy theory darling right now, yes. You outed yourself with that reference.

Out here in the real world, military bases are all a huge environmental issue.

7

Sayoria t1_ivpxyjp wrote

My assumption is that there's probably 6 teeth in the whole entire town.

−15

dangott04 t1_ivpz42a wrote

Great Barrington voter here. I’m all for regulating dental insurers, but the 83% figure seems arbitrary, not based on data, insurers will have numerous ways to meet the 83% threshold, and there’s no guarantee that this will in any way lower costs or improve overall dental health.

−12

jmfranklin515 t1_ivpzm67 wrote

There’s a town in MA called Great Barrington? I think you’re just making that up.

−8

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivq0iw0 wrote

What convinced you that it was better to let insurance companies have no regulation in the amount of profit they can make? Like, how do you think an arbitrary number like 83% is worse than letting dental insurance companies charge more in premiums than they actually cover and services annually? Most dental insurance plans charge incredibly high premiums, and you can’t even begin to get major work done until at least the second or third year, by which time unless you’ve paid more in premiums than you are eligible for in the 50-65% coverage in services.

7

sjashe t1_ivq1mjk wrote

I voted no on that, because my dental insurance and plan has been very good and low cost for over 50 years.

Whenever you add more regulation and more laws.. and you get is a higher cost. Just watch what happens to our dental plans now.

I only wish our regular health care worked as well as our dental plans

−4

nick-j- t1_ivq1ols wrote

It’s better when you realize that Great Barrington was called that because there was another Barrington in Massachusetts (the one now in Rhode Island) when the town was created. So it wasn’t New Barrington, they went with Great Barrington because it’s that much better.

10

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivq387m wrote

Could you share that dental plan? I’d certainly appreciate a low cost dental plan that’s existed for 50 years.

But if your’s is already low costs and your benefits equal your premiums, then you wouldn’t have been affected.

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivq3nsz wrote

You know what? I don’t think you are telling the truth at all. You’ve only become active in the last year in the MA & NH subs. Are a Jordan Peterson fan. And make really weird assertions about communism.

What low cost plan do you have available to you in Great Barrington?

6

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivq435g wrote

So you bought dental insurance in MA in 1972? Only 6 years after is became available in MA? And have kept the same insurance company for 50 years? So you must have Delta Dental. THATS you idea of a low cost high benefit plan? Lmao…. No.

3

yodatsracist t1_ivq58rj wrote

There's a possibility that the numbers are just flipped, and which number was for which position got flipped at some point in the chain. Maybe the Town Clerk reported that issue wrong to the State and it will get fixed before it's certified, or maybe it got reported wrong to whatever data service the the Globe is using (assuming these aren't directly from the Secretary of State's website).

6

Peteostro t1_ivq5mbx wrote

Man I love the day after election day in Massachusetts where it reminds Republicans living here that their voice means sh*t. Every once in a while we toss them a very moderate republican governor and they get their hopes up that they have a chance here. I mean they actually ran a republican candidate with the political views of Diehl here. It’s just F’in hilarious

3

[deleted] t1_ivq9q8u wrote

Choose to believe what you want. Until one day the government comes and kicks you out of your house to flood your town for the common good.

−2

[deleted] t1_ivqa9qw wrote

No shit. It’s a headline. It’s not political that military families are suffering because the government lies and treats people like animals.

Something happened in the last two generations where shot head kids got old enough to vote and they think we need the government. It’s supposed to be public service. The governement needs you and your tax money. Now it’s just blatant corruption yet all you Libs keep going down the same path.

I enjoy occasionally framing things less on party lines and I should make a coffee table book of lib reactions - you all love conservatism, as long as it’s not framed that way.

1

wkomorow t1_ivqasrk wrote

The community is really nice and like the rest of the Berkshires quite liberal and welcoming. Main street is confusing to drive down, there is this strange curve in the road. The institute dates back to the 30s.

My thought was that people do not always understand the complexities of some of the ballot questions and if you see vote no signs all over place, you might vote no.

7

Watchfull_Hosemaster t1_ivqb1lj wrote

It should be 100% if we're looking for a non-arbitrary number! This bill guarantees them 17% to skim off the top of insurance premiums just for being the middle-man in financial transactions for when we need to get our gums cleaned and our teeth polished.

Amazing that people that are not trained in dentistry can make $17 BY LAW for every $100 we spend for getting root canals and fillings and they are complaining about it. Be grateful for our corrupted system. We could overhaul the entire thing and put them out of business.

2

saloondweller t1_ivqc7u6 wrote

Everyone out that way is kind of a moron tbh...my work has a location in Sheffield and the bs I've had to listen to from town officials makes my brain melt. Everyone in the Berkshires pretends they are liberal until the second it's time to actually prove it with money and effort

0

Lil_Brown_Bat t1_ivqdp1i wrote

What is the source of this map? I know I've seen election results by town in previous years but i can't find it this year for some reason. My usually excellent google fu is failing me.

2

MonsieurReynard t1_ivqiexk wrote

Live two towns over. The reason is we have no teeth around here. So why should we pay for yours?

I jest of course. It's a lovely place to live and most people here are pretty community-oriented. And while we probably have fewer teeth than Boston, we have enough to get the job done.

8

[deleted] t1_ivqinwa wrote

😂😂😂 this is a typical liberal response, ignorant and about as eloquent as a dying boar.

You’re a college kid from Georgia calling me a hick? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 nearly pissed myself when I saw that

1

Peteostro t1_ivqslnk wrote

Another sad day in Mass for you, maybe you should move to Florida. You can be in the Republicans paradise! Why continue to stay cold and sad in liberal Massachusetts?

1

nrvs_hbt OP t1_ivrg49z wrote

Download the extension EditThisCookie and use it to trial-and-error block cookies until you find the ones that get rid of the paywall while still rendering the content correctly

1

TheCavis t1_ivrkq9j wrote

I agree on it not being uncommon. I ran across a bunch of weird results from Charlton last night that had a similar issue, except there were errors in both the unofficial results (since updated) and the map results in different places. It gave 5000-1 result for one of the questions, which is a lot more obvious than this sort of error.

It’s just tough to perfectly parse this much data from this many towns and hard to find errors like this unless you’re specifically looking for specific weirdness in a particular area on a particular question. It all gets cleared up for the official results, so it’s just a matter of slightly annoying us impatient people who need our data now.

2

sjashe t1_ivu7sm1 wrote

Sorry I don't post to your standard of acceptability.

Peterson is a fascinating speaker, making a great impact on thousands (more than any reddit poster).

As to me, if I've paid more than $30 a year over 50 years on dental costs (beyond the premium, which is <$5 a week), I'ld be surprised (and it was usually a mistake by the dentist where he overcharged.. and I let it go).

0

dementedmunster t1_ivu8ycf wrote

Hey, as one of the owners of one of those businesses (Yellow House Books), YES, we do take Berkshares. I also know the co-op takes them, because that's where we spend ours, lol.

We have the book "The First 175 Years of Crane Papermaking" in our local book section, if anyone gets really interested in the topic!

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivuc2oz wrote

Prove it. Show me ONE dental plan in MA that has existed for 50 years that costs less than $5 a week and covers enough to only pay $30 a year in co-pays.

There isn’t one, you big fat lying shill. Get the fuck out of here because you already lost.

There has been no plan available in Massachusetts for 50 years that cost less than five dollars a week and covers everything. Prove it or you’re a big fat lying shil.

1

sjashe t1_ivv4svh wrote

Wow.. you are really the example of reddit commenter.

I said I have had insurance here for over 50 years.. first through parents, then through my employer for last 35 years. Im sure the insurer changed many times over the years, but I just checked my paystub and I paid 8.88 for a two week period.

Sorry your life is so tough. I'm saying I like my dental care. Sad that you let this get you so upset, life is too short for that.

0

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivv6yq9 wrote

Yup. I am a typical Redditor. I know how easy it is to provide evidence. But you refuse to… because you can’t. Honestly, embarrass me! Prove me wrong!

Lmao…. If you can’t stand the typical Redditor this much, then maybe you don’t belong here. Because we all expect evidence. We aren’t stupid, we know what astroturfing is we know what paid shills look like, and we know what trolls look like. This isn’t Facebook. Try somewhere else if you think you can do better.

Or prove me wrong. With evidence besides your invaluable word

Really… prove to me that those numbers ACTUALLY exist.

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivv79xs wrote

Seriously, prove it. Blank out your name and address besides zip code, since you are pretending to be from Great Barrington. Show my those paystubs. And link me the the dental plan. It’s publicly available information

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivw8xn0 wrote

Prove it. Show me the paystubs with your address and name blanked. But you better leave the zip code since you are pretending to be from Great Barrington. Or link to the plan. Because you are a liar

Your word means nothing. Evidence is publicly available. Or you could provide your own individual evidence blanking out identifying information. Do it or fuck off. Because you’re a goddamn liar

And show me what benefits you are eligible for at that price. Because it’s nothing more than a scam

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivw9qae wrote

So you pay $1500 a year. For what? $75 for an annual exam? X rays every couple of years for $250 every two years? So you spend $1500 a year to get $200 a year in preventative care? What’s your co-pay for that? How much do they cover in other services?

Seriously, come with numbers and proof of those numbers or GTFO. Because you STILL haven’t provided anything but your bullshit word.

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivws9z1 wrote

That’s not how math works. 17% doesn’t magically become 40%. And if they can skim that much under the new law, how much were they scamming us for before? Shills are getting sad in their efforts

0

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivzc8tx wrote

What happened to the free market? If costs go up so much, it will be cheaper to just pay for the dental work, and people won’t buy the insurance.

You do realize that they are required to spend 83% of the premiums on services right? Because if premiums go up, the paid for services just as well. You really don’t get this

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivzmiip wrote

Except that people won’t buy dental insurance that doesn’t make sense for them. And you can’t make a profit if you can’t sell a product. People who need more expensive work can buy the insurance but it won’t make them a profit

Weird how the same requirements have worked for health insurance… but won’t for dental? An unnecessary insurance?

If you can predict how this law will lead to unsustainable premium increases, can you show evidence of where it’s happened before? Peer reviewed studies… NOT just your words. Because you do keep saying the same thing but ignoring the fact that people will drop plans that don’t work for them, AND that it’s worked well for health insurance. Please provide evidence to support your assumed assertions. Otherwise it means nothing

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivzpows wrote

Here is an article for HR folks about increases in premiums.

Look at the graph based on Dept of Labor statistics showing the increases in total insurance costs. The premiums had a huge spike around 2000, and then dropped substantially and regularly after the ACA (Obamacare) was passed. Even now, premium increases are out paced by inflation. And that’s not considering the added costs to health care with an aging population. The Boomers are getting older and sicker. So, premiums HAVE GONE DOWN since the same law was instituted for health care. Why would it be different for a voluntary insurance that most people wouldn’t need if the premiums got higher than preventative care cost. Please… show me

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivzre37 wrote

It’s funny how I provided evidence, but you won’t. Probably because the evidence supports that premiums will not go through the roof. we don’t need to wait a year to see what happens, there’s already data that shows what happens when we pass these kinds of laws. It’s also weird that you were completely interested in debating this point until I asked for evidence and provided some of my own. But it’s cool, you can wait a year to see that I was right

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_ivzrr2o wrote

Oh yeah, and that’s not why insurance works. Insurance works because insurers can negotiate lower rates for services on an individual can. So we pay premiums and they pay lower cost, that’s where their profit comes from. Not from people paying worthless insurance that they will never use

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_iw0365l wrote

Moving the goalpost there real nice.

I want peer reviewed studies showing that the 83% rule leads to unsustainable premium increases. Not an opinion column whose citations include showing the Medicaid costs went up after chiropractic services were added. You didn’t read it.

But go ahead, wait a year. Then come on back and show me how the dental plans in MA are worse. Even use the remind me! bot. Bc I’m done. You aren’t engaging in good faith and I’m bored. Bye!

1

MOGicantbewitty t1_iw2xkr3 wrote

Yes, I’m so aaaangry. Now you’ve really proved me wrong. Lmao

Those plans every single one of them has a maximum benefit of $1000 a year. MAX! Plus deductibles. And at best cover preventative care and 40-50% of other dental care. Including fillings. But only up to $1000. That’s it’s.

And you STILL didn’t prove that’s what you pay. Nor that the new law wouldn’t make it better.

Go away shill. You lost and you still haven’t shown me anything that backs up your argument. Bye!

1