Submitted by Essarray t3_yqu7a4 in massachusetts
Essarray OP t1_ivskmwj wrote
Reply to comment by great_blue_hill in Don't forget to visit the NH and ME subs today to thank them. by Essarray
Nope. Just common sense: the more you charge the more you make. If you have a product that people need to survive they'll pay almost whatever you tell them.
[deleted] t1_ivubafj wrote
Why would this occur in any given period of time versus any previous period of time? That's kind of the question at play.
Essarray OP t1_ivudegp wrote
Tantrums when corporations don't get their way? Fewer obstacles to discourage it? I'm not seeing anything that says 'necessity.'
[deleted] t1_ivwseym wrote
Fewer obstacles to discourage what exactly? When the purchasing power of the dollar decreases against pretty much every good in our economy, your explanation is that there is some kind of angry tantrum on the part of many companies leading to punitive price increase?
Essarray OP t1_ivwzlhj wrote
Price gouging.
We're talking about oil companies, right? They don't seem to be hurting. So yes, that is my accusation. But go ahead and keep defending the poor innocent bastards.
great_blue_hill t1_ivsyefx wrote
Cool so dumb lib talking point. There are sanctions on Russian energy exports if you haven’t noticed yet.
Essarray OP t1_ivsyxtu wrote
Yes, there's a reason for that you might be aware of.
Here's another lib talking point (acknowledging them doesn't refute them): prices have gone up and the companies are bragging about record profits. Ultrasimplistic? Yes. Realistic? Completely.
great_blue_hill t1_ivt14o1 wrote
Corporate profits are almost always at a record high just like the size of the economy is almost always at a record high just like employee compensation is almost always at a record high. It’s called “economic growth.”
Academic_Guava_4190 t1_ivt40wa wrote
Ok and who do you think pays for that?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments