Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j298nxy wrote

Reply to comment by SugarSecure655 in Boston man charged with bringing loaded gun to Logan Airport Terminal A security by JBupp

Nothing, as long as it's a moral and valid law. Requiring an LTC isn't either of those things.

−2

5teerPike t1_j29huhi wrote

It's perfectly moral not to let former criminals who are repeat offenders to have the means to kill people efficiently.

7

PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29i7v7 wrote

Hahahahaah. So now he is a murderer. Keep making those giant leaps Superman. Fear is a choice my dude.

−1

5teerPike t1_j29igfl wrote

Fear is a choice? So why do you need a gun if you're not afraid?

4

[deleted] t1_j29ixl5 wrote

[removed]

−1

5teerPike t1_j29j9pz wrote

He was previously convicted for a violent crime.

Why do you need a gun if you're not afraid ? Seems like you're avoiding the question because I hit a nerve on that point.

3

PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29k9c4 wrote

Hahaha. Hit what nerve? You asked a silly question thinking it's some kind of "gotcha" when it wasn't. Carrying a gun isn't about fear. It's about preparedness, same as a seat belt, and a fire extinguisher or smoke alarms in your house. I don't expect anyone to carry a gun that doesn't want to, it's weird you'd expect someone else not to. Let people be.

0

5teerPike t1_j29kqr4 wrote

I don't expect people with violent criminal records to be allowed to have guns. What are you preparing for that you need a gun all the time? Still sounds fearful to me.

What was he preparing for, The felon with the history of criminal violence?

2

[deleted] t1_j29luew wrote

[removed]

0

5teerPike t1_j29m273 wrote

What I'm doing is free speech right now. You're just mad nobody who is reasonable agrees with you.

He literally has a history of criminal violence, did you even read the article?

Why do you need a gun if you're not afraid

3

PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29otwy wrote

I'm not mad at all. I'm having a conversation. The worst thing about the internet is everyone thinks everyone else is mad because of opposing views. You are a complete stranger. You have no ability to make me mad. I don't care if he is a violent criminal , if he is out of prison, he gets full access to his rights. That's how a free society should work. If he is too dangerous to have his rights, then they shouldn't have let him out. Now back to your repeated fake gotcha question , I already told you, same reason you'd use a seatbelt or fire extinguisher, just in case. Your working theory seems to be that just because I'm not walking around afraid, like you, then I am not aware that bad things can happen. And that's silly.

0

5teerPike t1_j29pl47 wrote

Lmfao you don't like it when I say you're, obviously, mad but you get to say I'm afraid. That's rich! I dont need a gun like you, so what are you preparing for that has you so afraid that you need a gun?

My working theory is that you're projecting. People with violent criminal histories don't get to have guns, why that bothers you is incredibly suspect.

I dont have a history of criminal violence, so if I want a gun I can have one. Sorry! You don't get to if you've been a violent piece of shit to people!

That you're more concerned with their "right" to have the means to kill people rather than the right to vote once they get out says a lot too!

3

SugarSecure655 t1_j29kcwc wrote

Well apparently the majority of people voted for it which as least makes it a valid law. I have no idea why you think it's immoral to obey the law just because you don't agree with it.

2

PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29p37l wrote

You think that there was a public vote on licenses to carry? I didn't say obeying the law is immoral. I said the law itself is immortal because it takes away ones rights.

2