Submitted by JBupp t3_zyy28d in massachusetts
[deleted] t1_j29luew wrote
Reply to comment by 5teerPike in Boston man charged with bringing loaded gun to Logan Airport Terminal A security by JBupp
[removed]
5teerPike t1_j29m273 wrote
What I'm doing is free speech right now. You're just mad nobody who is reasonable agrees with you.
He literally has a history of criminal violence, did you even read the article?
Why do you need a gun if you're not afraid
PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29otwy wrote
I'm not mad at all. I'm having a conversation. The worst thing about the internet is everyone thinks everyone else is mad because of opposing views. You are a complete stranger. You have no ability to make me mad. I don't care if he is a violent criminal , if he is out of prison, he gets full access to his rights. That's how a free society should work. If he is too dangerous to have his rights, then they shouldn't have let him out. Now back to your repeated fake gotcha question , I already told you, same reason you'd use a seatbelt or fire extinguisher, just in case. Your working theory seems to be that just because I'm not walking around afraid, like you, then I am not aware that bad things can happen. And that's silly.
5teerPike t1_j29pl47 wrote
Lmfao you don't like it when I say you're, obviously, mad but you get to say I'm afraid. That's rich! I dont need a gun like you, so what are you preparing for that has you so afraid that you need a gun?
My working theory is that you're projecting. People with violent criminal histories don't get to have guns, why that bothers you is incredibly suspect.
I dont have a history of criminal violence, so if I want a gun I can have one. Sorry! You don't get to if you've been a violent piece of shit to people!
That you're more concerned with their "right" to have the means to kill people rather than the right to vote once they get out says a lot too!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments